(September 29, 2018 at 5:18 pm)alpha male Wrote:(September 29, 2018 at 4:15 pm)Joods Wrote: Mark Judge didn't provide testimony because he wasn't there to do so. Neither were any other witnesses present to offer testimony. You know this. So quit trying to move your fucking goal posts. Mark Judge didn't give anything but a very weak, six sentence letter (NOT performed UNDER OATH) which hardly speaks for his credibility.
You really should follow the thread if you're going to participate. I've shown several times that those statements were made under penlty of felony, max imprisonment 5 years.
Not the same thing as an actual testimony, dumb ass.
Quote:
(September 29, 2018 at 4:49 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Actual testimony includes the right of examination. Judge hasn't been examined by anybody (yet).
And he's going to be, so the problem is...?
Yeah, NOW he is. Before, he refused to be a witness. The FYI will apply pressure so now he's more than willing to cooperate on the condition that it's all done "confidentially". Whatever the fuck that means. The results of the investigation are not going to be kept under wraps.
Quote:You guys act as if I'm dead set against him being questioned. I'm not. I'm against delay tactics. I previously said I'd support an investigation of up to 2 weeks.
Now, if Judge sticks to his story with the FBI, you guys are gonna believe him, right?
I'll reserve my judgement for afterwards.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.