RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any ?
December 28, 2018 at 4:12 pm
(This post was last modified: December 28, 2018 at 4:16 pm by T0 Th3 M4X.)
(December 28, 2018 at 11:45 am)Gae Bolga Wrote:(December 28, 2018 at 11:34 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: No need to rage dude. It makes more sense to state the actual fallacy rather than state the specific name of the fallacy. Must be an atheist thing.
Looks like a "no" to both questions.
Bot
(December 28, 2018 at 11:45 am)polymath257 Wrote:(December 28, 2018 at 11:21 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: How many sources would you like? If my citation wasn't adequate, on what basis didn't it meet your standard(s)?
We study with parameters. If something is "supernatural" how would we establish parameters by something not bound by our natural laws because it supersedes them by how it's defined?
By making whatever observations are possible, finding patterns in the observed behavior, making hypotheses about those patterns, and testing them with further observations.
And why would you think something exists if it cannot, even in theory, be observed?
Right, so back to the original question. What would you consider evidence?
(December 28, 2018 at 1:26 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:(December 28, 2018 at 10:08 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Thanks. On the basis of your statement, I have no reason to attempt to.
But all I did was ask you to provide proof of something you believe in. If you believe in something without any proof then how certain are you that its real?
You're making an assumption. I never said I didn't have any proof. But then again, I never asserted that I had any. No reason to jump the gun here.
