Scum-Sucking Xhristard Fuckwit!

[Reltzik]

.... I might be a newbie here, but I'm getting the sneaking suspicion from somewhere that Huggy isn't exactly the most honest and trustworthy individual on these boards.

Based on?

Well since you asked...

You cast doubt on her story on the basis that she wouldn't be inconvenienced when there were so many other pharmacies within 2 miles, when the linked story explicitly stated that the pharmacist refused to transfer the prescription.

You also questioned the timing of her getting the prescription weeks after the (first) miscarriage, when some quick research easily explained why that was.

You then cited US law regarding the transfer of schedule 3, 4, and 5 drugs. When challenged on the subject of whether misporostol ws a controlled substance, you linked an information page saying that misoprostol was schedule 4.... in South Africa. You left out the part about it being about South Africa. It took very little fact-checking to discover that the information page was about South Africa... because that was at the bottom of the very page you linked. Misoprostol is NOT listed on the DEA's list of controlled substances. (Scroll down to page 12 of the pdf to see where it would be listed, and isn't, between Midazolam and MMB-CHMICA.) Again, this is very quick research to do.

You said that pharmacies don't HAVE to transfer the prescription, yet this company policy explicitly required pharmacists who refuse to fill prescriptions on religious grounds must either hand the prescription off to someone in the same shop or transfer the prescription. Again, this was easy research to do.

You then attempted to reframe what your point was, suggesting that the pharmacist refused to transfer the prescription out of simple laziness, but again in the linked story the pharmacist explicitly cited his status as a Catholic as part of the reason for his refusal. Also, your reframing was one under which it makes no sense for you to have linked US law, South African drug scheduling, distance to nearby pharmacies, or time delay between miscarriage and prescription.

You also implied that requiring a prescription makes misoprostol a controlled substance. This is simply untrue. Controlled substances refers specifically to substances assigned to a schedule (ranked from 1 to 5) under the system established by the Controlled Substances Act. Drugs requiring prescriptions are covered by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act, and include many drugs that are not scheduled under the CSA. Again, this is easy research to do.

At every step of the way you declined to retract or even acknowledge previous errors.

Nearly all of these are the sort of honest mistakes that people can make. Or it could be the result of deliberate deception. No way for me to tell for sure, though your nonsensical reframing that was completely at odds with your previous posts has me leaning towards the idea that something hinky is going on.

But all right, I'll be generous. I shall suppose that every step of the way you honestly believed the points you were putting forward and that your reframing was out of step with your previous points because, oh, I dunno, you let yourself get derailed or something. Fine. It's possible. Yet even with that level of generosity, we would still have your posts repeatedly lacking in the most basic of fact-checking, your points consistently wrong on most crucial elements, and you contributions universally not something to be trusted or relied upon.

In short, be it deliberate or by a bizarrely negligent failure to do even the most basic of research, pretty much everything you've said in this thread is untrustworthy.