RE: Converting
April 11, 2020 at 7:58 pm
(This post was last modified: April 11, 2020 at 8:00 pm by R00tKiT.)
(April 11, 2020 at 7:41 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: MODERN man appeared several hundred thousand years ago, though there is evidence appearing almost yearly that pushes our age back further.
And if that's the case, what makes you certain the religious narrative definitely contradicts what we know so far.
(April 11, 2020 at 7:41 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Piltdown man. A proverbial favourite of the creationists. Publushed in a non-peer reviewed journal an finally outed by scientists.
Why are you conflating abiogenesis with evolution?
The point is, the hoax happened because someone needed to support shaky claims. I'm not saying evolution didn't happen, nor that there is other evidence supporting its claims. But I wouldn't call it a fact.
(April 11, 2020 at 7:41 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Why are you conflating abiogenesis with evolution?
Isn't that what you think happened though? If there is no divine intervention, surely life came spontaneously thanks to some crazy chemical coincidence
(April 11, 2020 at 7:45 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Then, no. A god being just does not imply that that god would necessarily guide its creations.
Boru
Whut.? In what sense a god can be called just, then.. If its creatures have no clue of what they're doing on earth .?
