RE: Are lockdowns justified?
April 22, 2021 at 11:49 am
(This post was last modified: April 22, 2021 at 11:55 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Seriously? From a quick Google searchGood you provided a source now my response is it's irrelevant as it's merely a condemnation of society's lack of social care not an objection to lockdowns.
Quote:Stay-at-home orders are responsible for Vitamin D deficiency, which makes COVID more severe.This has been debunked over and over on this thread
Quote:As I have cited multiple times by now, even CDC admits the risk of getting COVID from touching contaminated objects is very low. It was even on New York Times:Low doesn't mean doesn't happen. Even your own acknowledge it can happen and its prevention is conditional as well as its spread
So again you fail
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
