(February 26, 2022 at 9:10 pm)Klorophyll Wrote:(June 23, 2021 at 2:41 pm)viocjit Wrote: You declared than Wikiislam : "Attempts to find scientific errors in the Qur'an [News flash : there are none]"
My answer is the next. If we interpret literally Al-Qur'an evolution of species isn't mentioned and this is scientifically proven.
The Qur'an not mentioning something doesn't mean it's against it. The Qur'an also doesn't mention that there are five daily prayers, a central tenet of Islam, which all Muslims (are supposed to) apply rigorously.
(June 23, 2021 at 2:41 pm)viocjit Wrote: If we understand evolution theory we understand there was never a first human who was a man then a second who was a female.
Species evolved slowly and there were first groups of humans (Not our species but others species) and slowly our specie appeared.
Non sequitur. Our species appearing "slowly" doesn't mean there is no first human. The first member of our species to ever appear can be the first human, what's the problem with that?
(June 23, 2021 at 2:41 pm)viocjit Wrote: You made the statement than Wikiislam : "Attempts to find logical inconsistencies in authentic hadiths."
I answer you. Who considered at first than ahadith contain in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim are authentic ? Authenticity or not is a thing we can't prove. It is a matter of faith.
Authenticity can be established by evaluating the chain of narrators of a hadith, if the narrators are deemed reliable, and some additional conditions are met, the hadith can be said to be authentic. This is not an exact science, OFC. But we can have a pretty accurate idea of whether a hadith really came from Muhammad PBUH or was later fabricated.
"The Qur'an not mentioning something doesn't mean it's against it"
If we interpret it literally. It said Adam was made with clay.
Evolution theory prove there was not a first human because they were first humans of both sex appearing at the same time.
"Authenticity can be established by evaluating the chain of narrators of a hadith, if the narrators are deemed reliable, and some additional conditions are met, the hadith can be said to be authentic."
How can we be sure chain of narrators wasn't forged ?
How can we be sure not any hadith was forged ?
Do we have a book of ahadith dating back from Muhammad era ?
