RE: A Case for Inherent Morality
June 21, 2021 at 11:48 am
(This post was last modified: June 21, 2021 at 11:48 am by brewer.)
(June 21, 2021 at 10:09 am)Angrboda Wrote:(June 20, 2021 at 10:53 pm)brewer Wrote: It could also suggest that by the age of 6 months (I think that was the earliest age) they could have acquired the ability to differentiate, and desire, nurturing behavior over non nurturing learned their parents. I see that others have addressed this. And then it could be a choice to select the least threatening behavior for self preservation and pain avoidance. The problem is that the babies can't communicate why they made their decision.
Are you sure adult behavior cannot be similarly explained? We feel altruism is good and virtuous, yet we know its roots go down to self-interest in kinship selection.
Never said it couldn't. The difference is that you can question the adult and debate alternative motives. Not so much with infants.
There could also be all kinds of non emotional reasons for the babies choices, but I chose to give John emotional reasons as that seems to be part of his position.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.