The Burden of Proof

[Atheistfreethinker]

Equally Anti religious claims shoulder the same burden. IOW : STFU

But note, only if they are claims

Are you the only one in this assylum that gets this? Certainly the OP doesn't seem to have a fucking clue.

I absolutely get the idea. But I'm not making a supernatural improbable claim. I am simply doubting that the object of the assertion by theist exist. I don't have to support my position because I'm not making the fucking claim. What is it with you retarded fucking religious assholes and your fucking inability to understand that if you make an extraordinary claim that it is up to you to prove it. Are religious fanatics like you on drugs? Is there something in the water? What makes you think that the most ridiculous story ever told is true because there isn't any evidence that it isn't? THERE ISN'T ANY EVIDENCE THAT IT IS TRUE! Theists like to use this red herring to throw people off the fact that their whole proposition is bullshit.

Any claim that can be made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. You can't use reason with superstition the two are incompatible. If you give respect to one you in turn must abandon the other.