Ignosticism

[KichigaiNeko]

And that is all you have seen isn't it?? I spend 45 mins patiently answering your outrageous claims and you haven't read any of them.

Ok we'll play it your way...

So WHERE are these tomes of wisdom?? So that we can all "get our heads out of our arses"??

We are all agog.

[leo-rcc]

Kichi, could you cool your jets a little please? For the record, I've been following this thread for some time now and besides spewing some vague deepities I've not read anything wrong with his posts. You may not agree with his posts, but that is hardly a criteria for banning, or even a warning.

Ellease1, how about you getting of your high horse a little and try to make your posts a little more readable and with less vague deepities? If you think the concepts you put forward themselves are not vague, then you might want to consider that the way you put these concepts forward is not effective in any way. One of your first posts in this topic I had to re-read several times over to grasp what you were getting at, and I doubt many want to do that with every post you make. The idea of these forums are communication, that is a 2 way street. We will do the effort to see where you are coming from, if you do the effort and make your thoughts clearer.

[KichigaiNeko]

What jets?? And why pick my complaints out?? pad is also complaining about the preaching leo.

But hey....if ya like.. my work here is done.

[Zen Badger]

Kichi, could you cool your jets a little please? For the record, I've been following this thread for some time now and besides spewing some vague deepities I've not read anything wrong with his posts. You may not agree with his posts, but that is hardly a criteria for banning, or even a warning.

For the record Leo, Kichi is not the only one pissed off with Ellease's ramblings, several others on this thread have also expressed their irritation at this person.

I for one asked him/her to explain this "reality" of which they were talking about and told I was pretty much an idiot for even asking. An attitude not likely to generate any sympathy.

This person is either a troll or stoned, and if it keeps up they should be banned.

[leo-rcc]

Zen, on what grounds would this person be banned then? Because he/she makes annoying posts according to more people? That smells like mob rule to me.

People may think I was singling Kichi out, and that is my fault in the way I put it in that post, so I apologize for that, I should have made it more general.

But the point remains the same. Point out what part of the posts that annoy you are against the rules and we have a legitimate reason to warn or ban people, but just because some person rubs you the wrong way is not a valid reason.

[5thHorseman]

Ellease1,

I think you may suffer from delusions of grandeur, ignorance and overbearing arrogance.

---

Zen, on what grounds would this person be banned then? Because he/she makes annoying posts according to more people? That smells like mob rule to me.

People may think I was singling Kichi out, and that is my fault in the way I put it in that post, so I apologize for that, I should have made it more general.

But the point remains the same. Point out what part of the posts that annoy you are against the rules and we have a legitimate reason to warn or ban people, but just because some person rubs you the wrong way is not a valid reason.

Ellease1 is obviously a troll Leo, but given that you have followed this thread, you would have noticed.

I think Kichi may hav gotten annoyed, quite rightly, because she put in a lot of time answering back to Ellease1's BS and Ellease1 just ignored it and carried on trolling. At least Stat, GC, Lucent et al have the decency to reply.

---

Also, there is no reason for Kichi or anyone to cool their jets against this flaming ignoramus.

[leo-rcc]

Ellease1 is obviously a troll Leo, but given that you have followed this thread, you would have noticed.

Well I have followed the thread and I haven't noticed. If I had I would not have made the post I just made would I?

[5thHorseman]

It was sarcasm, but you clearly missed that too, nevermind.

[Whateverist]

I suppose if we don't like the way Ellease1 is conducting her/himself, we shouldn't feel compelled to reason with her. S(he) obviously would like to move on too but would enjoy a martyr's exit.

Stay. Go. Whatever. I'm not interested in any more unsupported FACTS or passing thoughts passed off as such.

[Shell B]

They always want a martyr's exit. While I do believe this has been flaming from the start, I am also a strong advocate for not feeding the "egos" of self-important noobs.