God formally disproven

[FallentoReason]

I don't believe that qualifies as a 'proof'. It would be more accurate to say that because opinions about god vary so much that is proves that the term god encompasses too many concepts. (awkward sentence but I think you get the gist.)

You're right it's not really a proof. Instead it shows this 'god' concept doesn't add up to anything that even people of the same religion will agree upon.

I've often thought, IF god was real then the world would be so much more different to now. His existence would be so undeniable that the human race would have unified under one religion, THE true religion. Instead all I see is bloodshed because no one has anything to show for their god except how dangerous they can be through blind faith.

[oxymoron]

@oxy again

So if you get to choose your own standard to measure goodness by then why can't the believer do the same?

That's fine, I'm pretty sure they do. But two things:

1. If by the claim of "omnibenevolent", you mean "anything any particular believer wants to claim", then the term is meaningless.

2. Many believers cite the alleged existence of objective morality as a reason for belief. So from this sort of reference frame, no - believers don't get to make it up. However, non-believers do