Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents?

[Epimethean]

Well, since you are a spamtroll, spewing out the same tired, swiss cheese arguments on multiple sites, a healthy dose of cyberbullying might do you good.

[Alter2Ego]

As for the assertion that I got my information from some scientific website, I ought to put that to Mr Franks, my senior school Astronomy teacher. Even at the age of 86, I'm sure he'd feel inclined to slap you daft(er) for such an insult. I may verify my information using current scientific knowledge, sure; I happen to care whether what I learn is accurate.

I'll close by reiterating what I said elsewhere: there's nothing random and accidental about the god-damn laws of physics!

ALTER2EGO -to- STIMBO:
Since you concede there is nothing random and accidental about laws of physics, tell me, where did such laws come from? They happened by themselves--meaning no intelligent person guided the outcome? Before you answer that question, below is a reminder of how Laws found in nature is defined by Webster's New World Dictionary.

"a sequence of events that have been observed to occur with UNVARYING UNIFORMITY under the same conditions."

[Epimethean]

There we have it: Because something is found to be consistent, Goddidit.

Boring, banal, and bullshit.

[Alter2Ego]

And you're not getting the point I'm making. You missed this:

So it's not like some cabal of scientists got together, made up a story and we liked it so much we decided to throw gods out of the picture and go with this one.

You're the one positing a divine creator behind all that we see. Three guesses which of us has the burden of proof.

ALTER2EGO -to- STIMBO:
The proof is the intelligent design seen in everything in the natural world. Here is the logic I'm using when I say that: It takes an intelligent, well-trained technician to build a functioning computer. The precision in the universe and in everything in the natural world makes the computer look like child's play. Therefore, by what logic am I supposed to believe that the far more complex universe resulted at random when, comparatively speaking, the measly computer required an intelligent person to build it? (That's a rhetorical question, by the way.)

[Epimethean]

"... by what logic am I supposed to believe that the far more complex universe resulted at random ...?"

The logic that supports science rather than its retarded cousin who excuses religion.

[Alter2Ego]

Well, since you are a spamtroll, spewing out the same tired, swiss cheese arguments on multiple sites, a healthy dose of cyberbullying might do you good.

ALTER2EGO -to- EPIMETHEAN:
It might be the same subject matters that I raise at various forums. I don't feel I should have to confine myself to the same group of people by staying on a single forum. Truth be told, I don't even participate at many of the forums I'm registered at. If that were the case, I would be forced to eat and sleep in front of the computer.

In any event, the important thing is that the forums where I do participate, I respond to people respectfully and I specifically address the points of their rebuttals with intelligent answers. I don't go around cursing people out or mocking them or preaching to them. I engage them in intelligent dialogue. Meanwhile, you're contributing nothing to this conversation. So who is the actual troll here?

ALTER2EGO -to- STIMBO:
Since you concede there is nothing random and accidental about laws of physics, tell me, where did such laws come from? They happened by themselves--meaning no intelligent person guided the outcome? Before you answer that question, below is a reminder of how Laws found in nature is defined by Webster's New World Dictionary.

"a sequence of events that have been observed to occur with UNVARYING UNIFORMITY under the same conditions."

There we have it: Because something is found to be consistent, Goddidit.

Boring, banal, and bullshit.

"... by what logic am I supposed to believe that the far more complex universe resulted at random ...?"

The logic that supports science rather than its retarded cousin who excuses religion.

ALTER2EGO -to- EPIMETHEAN:
See what I'm saying? You presented no intelligent rebuttal, no evidence from any credible source to refute what I wrote to Stimbo. I rest my case.

TROLL!

[Napoléon]

You presented no intelligent rebuttal

When that happened you threw a fucking hissy fit and put the person who showed you up to be an arse on ignore. Every time someone rebuts you it is in fact YOU who does not present any intelligent argument against, and when you can't answer questions you literally resort to ignorance.

Now, can someone please quote me here, so he can produce a proper, ADULT rebuttal other than "oh that man hurted my feelings" to my post: http://atheistforums.org/post-278759.html#pid278759


The ignorance and stupidity is indeed strong with this one.

[Reforged]

You presented no intelligent rebuttal

When that happened you threw a fucking hissy fit and put the person who showed you up to be an arse on ignore. Every time someone rebuts you it is in fact YOU who does not present any intelligent argument against, and when you can't answer questions you literally resort to ignorance.

Now, can someone please quote me here, so he can produce a proper, ADULT rebuttal other than "oh that man hurted my feelings" to my post: http://atheistforums.org/post-278759.html#pid278759


The ignorance and stupidity is indeed strong with this one.

Did anyone else get an errection from this beatdown? No? Oh, er... me neither.

(Oh and please stop putting everything in bright blue writing. We're not impressed by pretty colors.)

[Epimethean]

"When that happened you threw a fucking hissy fit and put the person who showed you up to be an arse on ignore. Every time someone rebuts you it is in fact YOU who does not present any intelligent argument against, and when you can't answer questions you literally resort to ignorance."

This.

Troll can't handle being spanked.

[Jaysyn]

Oh look, another fundie that doesn't understand the Anthropic Principal & sees god's hand in everything.

Yawn.

Magic isn't real kiddo.

Ah well. Just goes to show, stupid is as stupid does.

Also:

Here's a tip for you: GO LEARN WHAT THE FUCK A THEORY IS.

What is that thing we use to describe how gravity works? Oh yeah, it's a theory.
What is that thing we use to describe how evolution works? Oh yeah, it's a theory.
What is that thing we use to describe how germs work? Oh yeah, it's a theory.
What is that thing we use to describe how light works? Oh yeah, it's a theory.
What is that thing we use to describe how atoms work? Oh yeah, it's A FUCKING THEORY.

Get the message yet Einstein??

Or are you seriously sitting there saying you can disprove Photon theory, the theory of Evolution, general relativity, special relativity, Cell theory, Atomic theory, the theory of Matter and Energy, Quantum Mechanics... and all the other scientific THEORIES we have come up with to date?