(September 9, 2012 at 10:06 pm)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote:(September 9, 2012 at 6:35 pm)IATIA Wrote: It would seem to me that evidence, albeit untrue, anecdotal, in their head or even, god forbid, real. is the prime requisite for theism. I mean who in their right mind would worship a non existent deity?
It seems that way, but it's a false paradigm.
I believe you misinterpreted my post. Although I believe that it is insane to worship god on any level, that was not the reference intended.
A theist worships some god of which they have 'proof'. A theist does not worship a non existent deity in their mind.
Is that ambiguous enough?
By the way, I am a firm believer in the 'brain-in-a-vat' scenario. I have engaged in discussions as to what the 'vat' is, but it digresses and fades real quick.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy