Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 26, 2024, 9:21 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Libya
#11
RE: Libya
I saw on the news this morning, but I cannot find anything confiming it now, that the attack on the ambassador Chris Stevens was preplanned, and the riot may have been either a diversion or just the excuse the attackers were looking for. Anybody else hear this?
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#12
RE: Libya
(September 13, 2012 at 1:49 pm)Koldaramor Wrote: America during the cold war gave support to radical Islamic organizations. The reason for this was to prevent socialism. After collapse of SSBC, America tried to make radical Islam and moderate Islam. But this failed to work.

Weapons that killed the American ambassador, said that weapons given to the rebels by the United States.


The strategically wise thing for the US to have done was to patronize Secular Arab Nationalism. But after Eisenhower we weren't smart enough to do this, and basically ceded Arab nationalism to the Soviets.
Reply
#13
RE: Libya
Eisenhower was the last republican who was worth a damn.
Reply
#14
RE: Libya
If he was around now, he'd thrash Obama in an election.
Reply
#15
RE: Libya
If Eisenhower was around now they'd run his ass right out of the republicunt party.
Reply
#16
RE: Libya
(September 13, 2012 at 3:04 pm)Faith No More Wrote: I saw on the news this morning, but I cannot find anything confiming it now, that the attack on the ambassador Chris Stevens was preplanned, and the riot may have been either a diversion or just the excuse the attackers were looking for. Anybody else hear this?
I saw that as well. Also from what I heard on the news, though not confirmed, a Libyan official was suspected of passing information along to the terrorists prior to the attacks on the embassy.....but Libyan officials have arrested four people in connection to the embassy attacks......

http://www.interaksyon.com/article/43098...-consulate
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"

[Image: freddy_03.jpg]

Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.
Reply
#17
RE: Libya
One CNN article that says "Yes, it was Al-Qaeda."

One CNN article that says, "No, it wasn't."

Thinking

Granted, the "Yes" article is slightly fresher.
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
Reply
#18
RE: Libya
(September 13, 2012 at 9:29 am)5thHorseman Wrote: If nothing else, at lease normal Libyans are not afraid of the bastard terrorists and are willing to condemn them.

Quote:There are increasing signs that the attack on the US embassy in Libya was orchestrated by Al-Qaeda rather than local groups.

The Quilliam Foundation is nearly certain while the New York Times says US officials increasingly believe it to be the case.

Libyans seem to have reached that conclusion too. Yesterday, they held this demonstration in Benghazi

[Image: 7981241194_3570a3426f.jpg]

[Image: 7981241446_a9a2d4752a.jpg]

[Image: 7981238025_6d7e8c7ca0.jpg]

[Image: 7981238931_bc0ab051a7.jpg]

http://liberalconspiracy.org/2012/09/13/...s-embassy/

There is also a tweet at the bottom of the blog that says that 10 Libyan security force soldiers died defending the embassy.

Thanks for this post. It's very enlightening and heartwarming to see the people of Libya opposing the murderers.
Reply
#19
RE: Libya
(September 13, 2012 at 3:13 pm)Chuck Wrote:
(September 13, 2012 at 1:49 pm)Koldaramor Wrote: America during the cold war gave support to radical Islamic organizations. The reason for this was to prevent socialism. After collapse of SSBC, America tried to make radical Islam and moderate Islam. But this failed to work.

Weapons that killed the American ambassador, said that weapons given to the rebels by the United States.


The strategically wise thing for the US to have done was to patronize Secular Arab Nationalism. But after Eisenhower we weren't smart enough to do this, and basically ceded Arab nationalism to the Soviets.

In fact, against the spread of Soviet, the United States has supported creationism Islamic countries. Evangelists made ​​opposition to evolution. Also supported the hijab
Thus, the spread of Soviet stopped, but the fundamentalist Islamic stronger.
A culture of Islam in the Arabian peninsula, in this situation there is nothing for them to do. But in Egypt, North Africa, Iran, Afghanistan, the spread of Islam in these countries, an unfortunate situation for the world.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Emails Blow Hole in Administration's Libya Story Tino 17 6779 November 3, 2012 at 7:49 pm
Last Post: Tino
  Herman Cain's Libya flub Doubting Thomas 0 733 November 15, 2011 at 2:22 pm
Last Post: Doubting Thomas
Information Libya Protests: Tripoli In Open Revolt, Pro-Gaddafi Gangs Terrorize Capital HeyItsZeus 9 4174 February 28, 2011 at 6:05 pm
Last Post: Autumnlicious



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)