Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 3:04 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fundamentalist Trekkies....
#71
RE: Fundamentalist Trekkies....
I watched Star Trek as a kid when growing up.

It's not my fault I know it like the back of my hand.

Any more than I know the Bible due to my upbringing.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
#72
RE: Fundamentalist Trekkies....
Star wars one to three would have been better if there was less boring meetings and sitting and more Jedi vs Sith action.
1 to three explained how it was set up but 4 to 6 were better.
The need to make more a old republic (Jedi vs Sith (Darth Revan for example))
I like the New Star trek, it was better then the old ones and was more realistic (I don't care how many trekkies I offend, grow up) but I will always prefer Star Wars over Star Trek.
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful" - Edward Gibbon (Offen misattributed to Lucius Annaeus Seneca or Seneca the Younger) (Thanks to apophenia for the correction)
'I am driven by two main philosophies:
Know more about the world than I knew yesterday and lessen the suffering of others. You'd be surprised how far that gets you' - Neil deGrasse Tyson
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain
Reply
#73
RE: Fundamentalist Trekkies....
(September 21, 2012 at 5:17 pm)Gooders1002 Wrote: Star wars one to three would have been better if there was less boring meetings and sitting and more Jedi vs Sith action.
1 to three explained how it was set up but 4 to 6 were better.
The need to make more a old republic (Jedi vs Sith (Darth Revan for example))
I like the New Star trek, it was better then the old ones and was more realistic (I don't care how many trekkies I offend, grow up) but I will always prefer Star Wars over Star Trek.

Meh. I think the first three were going to suck balls no matter what. George Lucas is a greedy moron.

The new star trek? Really? You're into the whole concept of time travel completely destroying the premise of every single star trek film and episode that came before and replacing them with films where fetuses take charge of the enterprise?
Just seems like a lazy way to reboot the whole franchise and rake in some more cash to me.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die." 
- Abdul Alhazred.
Reply
#74
RE: Fundamentalist Trekkies....
(September 21, 2012 at 5:17 pm)Gooders1002 Wrote: I like the New Star trek, it was better then the old ones and was more realistic

The derp is strong with this one.

Apparently twenty-something angst and drama is "real" while a set of relatively mature actors who have only their interactions with each other to make the screen compelling isn't.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
#75
RE: Fundamentalist Trekkies....
(September 21, 2012 at 5:17 pm)Gooders1002 Wrote: I like the New Star trek, it was better then the old ones and was more realistic

Kirk in 24th century fruit of the looms may tickle your realism fantasies, It does not mine.


(September 21, 2012 at 5:17 pm)Gooders1002 Wrote: (I don't care how many trekkies I offend, grow up) but I will always prefer Star Wars over Star Trek.

Takes brass to admit to liking Star Wars more and then tell others to grow up.
Reply
#76
RE: Fundamentalist Trekkies....
Reply
#77
RE: Fundamentalist Trekkies....
(September 21, 2012 at 7:57 pm)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: J.J. Abrams into your heart so that you may enter the glory of his lens flair!,


Twenty fourth century lenses don't suffer from flares, thus JJ Abrams is a imposter . Q.E.D.

Angel
Reply
#78
RE: Fundamentalist Trekkies....
(September 21, 2012 at 5:17 pm)Gooders1002 Wrote: Star wars one to three would have been better if there was less boring meetings and sitting and more Jedi vs Sith action.

The only thing wrong with the three festering piles of crap Lucas called "prequels" is they needed to be totally scrapped and re-written. And then executed with a better casting choice for Anakin. Other than that...
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
#79
RE: Fundamentalist Trekkies....
(September 21, 2012 at 10:16 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:
(September 21, 2012 at 5:17 pm)Gooders1002 Wrote: Star wars one to three would have been better if there was less boring meetings and sitting and more Jedi vs Sith action.

The only thing wrong with the three festering piles of crap Lucas called "prequels" is they needed to be totally scrapped and re-written. And then executed with a better casting choice for Anakin. Other than that...

The only thing that should have been done was to have him take no part in their production.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Reply
#80
RE: Fundamentalist Trekkies....
I don't understand the hate for the prequels. They were just as stupid as the originals.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)