Goodluck ?

[catfish]

It does not have to be one or the other. Prove to me that it does.
.

What other option is there?

3. Both... (and remember, it's the "inspired" word of blah blah blah...)
.

[YahwehIsTheWay]

3. Both... (and remember, it's the "inspired" word of blah blah blah...)

So something can be "X" and "not X" at the same time?

Tell you what, I'll cut to the chase since you like to be obtuse.

If the Bible was originally inspired by Yahweh but he didn't pay close attention to the details, the whole needs to be regarded as "not the Word of God" since we have no way of telling what parts are divine and what parts are human.

...and this brings us back to the whole, "how do you know what parts are divine? Are you God?" issue that you kept dodging earlier.

This is why there's no "sorta, kinda, you see, it's a little of both and yet neither one" option.

[catfish]

3. Both... (and remember, it's the "inspired" word of blah blah blah...)

So something can be "X" and "not X" at the same time?

Tell you what, I'll cut to the chase since you like to be obtuse.

If the Bible was originally inspired by Yahweh but he didn't pay close attention to the details, the whole needs to be regarded as "not the Word of God" since we have no way of telling what parts are divine and what parts are human.

...and this brings us back to the whole, "how do you know what parts are divine? Are you God?" issue that you kept dodging earlier.

This is why there's no "sorta, kinda, you see, it's a little of both and yet neither one" option.

You gotta stop with this whole "Word of God" thing unless your "Word of God" calls itself that and you can prove it. Remember, it's INSPIRED...

You say it can't be both? Then I have a question for you: Do you hallucinate often?
.

[YahwehIsTheWay]

You gotta stop with this whole "Word of God" thing unless your "Word of God" calls itself that and you can prove it. Remember, it's INSPIRED...

You say it can't be both? Then I have a question for you: Do you hallucinate often?
.

And you continue to tap dance around my question without addressing it. Can you determine which parts of the Bible are godly and which parts are human insertion? If so, share the secrets of this miraculous skill you possess.

[catfish]

You gotta stop with this whole "Word of God" thing unless your "Word of God" calls itself that and you can prove it. Remember, it's INSPIRED...

You say it can't be both? Then I have a question for you: Do you hallucinate often?
.

And you continue to tap dance around my question without addressing it. Can you determine which parts of the Bible are godly and which parts are human insertion? If so, share the secrets of this miraculous skill you possess.

Your question is silly and irrelevant if you can't concede that the Bible can be both inspired and not...
If you want me to address your question, then address mine... Prove to me that I'm a phony Christian, I'll be waiting for ions I bet.
.

[downbeatplumb]

You gotta stop with this whole "Word of God" thing unless your "Word of God" calls itself that and you can prove it. Remember, it's INSPIRED...

You say it can't be both? Then I have a question for you: Do you hallucinate often?
.

I have seen many hollywood films that were "inspired" by real events but actually bore no resemblance to what actually happened. (U-571 I am looking at you)

[YahwehIsTheWay]

Your question is silly and irrelevant if you can't concede that the Bible can be both inspired and not...

Seriously? Does someone need a course in basic logic that something can't be "x" and "not x" at the same time

If you want me to address your question, then address mine... Prove to me that I'm a phony Christian, I'll be waiting for ions I bet.
.

How many charged particles do you expect to go through?

Dumb ass phony Christian doesn't even know the difference between historical ages and particle physics.

[catfish]

Your question is silly and irrelevant if you can't concede that the Bible can be both inspired and not...

Seriously? Does someone need a course in basic logic that something can't be "x" and "not x" at the same time

Do you deny that something can be a percentage of your desired X or not X?
If you wish to deny that reality, then I'll just assert now that you're a crazy moron who believes his visual hallucinations are 100% accurate.
(unless you admit to hallucinating)

If you want me to address your question, then address mine... Prove to me that I'm a phony Christian, I'll be waiting for ions I bet.
.

How many charged particles do you expect to go through?

Dumb ass phony Christian doesn't even know the difference between historical ages and particle physics.

I know the difference, I made a spelling mistake which I fully acknowledge. So now what are you going to do? Make me wait for an eonian to address the issues?

But hey, I totally understand your frustration of being a sock puppet and all... To use your real identity and reveal that you don't know these simple facts about the Bible would probrably make you lose rep points, huh?
.

[YahwehIsTheWay]

Do you deny that something can be a percentage of your desired X or not X?

And what's the percentage exactly? And you can tell the difference between the inspired parts and the human contamination how? Are you God? This is the question I keep asking and you keep ignoring.

[catfish]

Do you deny that something can be a percentage of your desired X or not X?

And what's the percentage exactly? And you can tell the difference between the inspired parts and the human contamination how? Are you God? This is the question I keep asking and you keep ignoring.

Are you one of the fucking sheeple? Really, you keep asking me how I come to my conclusions and I keep telling you to read it for yourself... Grow a pair and think for yourself for once...
.