For some reason that JFK was shot by multiple gunmen is the most popularly believed of conspiracy theories. Sometimes I think it's just because otherwise intelligent people haven't properly looked into it. In fact a total recreation of the "magic bullet" was made with the most like life dummies available. Lo and behold the exact same injuries were produced in the same spots as happened with just one shooter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZRUNYZY71g
That in and of itself should be convincing enough to show that there was only one shooter. What's the evidence for a second shooter on the grassy knoll. Well there is an actual photograph taken of the grassy knoll at the time Kennedy was shot. Behold!
![[Image: awx8x0.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i48.tinypic.com%2Fawx8x0.jpg)
I think a rational person would see the same thing that I do. Nothing. There isn't anyone on the grassy knoll. Conspiracy theorists point towards a vague shadowy part of this photo as proof of a gunman. Even though all it is is vague shadows. I challenge anyone on here to point out which part of this photo looks more like a gunman than any other part. People who believe this garbage are just people who are incapable of separating good evidence from bad evidence in their mind.
The other piece of 'evidence' for a second shooter on the knoll are a small handful of people said they heard shots from the knoll. This is despite the fact that the majority of people heard the shots solely from the book depository and only five people out of more than one hundred heard shots for more than one direction. So if you put weight on where confused people hear gunshots from, the evidence is still vastly in favor of a single shooter from the book depository.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/shots.htm
All in all I don't understand how people believe this garbage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZRUNYZY71g
That in and of itself should be convincing enough to show that there was only one shooter. What's the evidence for a second shooter on the grassy knoll. Well there is an actual photograph taken of the grassy knoll at the time Kennedy was shot. Behold!
![[Image: awx8x0.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i48.tinypic.com%2Fawx8x0.jpg)
I think a rational person would see the same thing that I do. Nothing. There isn't anyone on the grassy knoll. Conspiracy theorists point towards a vague shadowy part of this photo as proof of a gunman. Even though all it is is vague shadows. I challenge anyone on here to point out which part of this photo looks more like a gunman than any other part. People who believe this garbage are just people who are incapable of separating good evidence from bad evidence in their mind.
The other piece of 'evidence' for a second shooter on the knoll are a small handful of people said they heard shots from the knoll. This is despite the fact that the majority of people heard the shots solely from the book depository and only five people out of more than one hundred heard shots for more than one direction. So if you put weight on where confused people hear gunshots from, the evidence is still vastly in favor of a single shooter from the book depository.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/shots.htm
All in all I don't understand how people believe this garbage.
![[Image: dcep7c.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i46.tinypic.com%2Fdcep7c.jpg)