Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 2, 2025, 10:13 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Argument From Nonbelief
#1
The Argument From Nonbelief
MAIN CONTENTION:

The existence of non-belief is contradictory to the very idea that the Christian God exists.

There are lots of people in the world who do not have a belief in a God. Furthermore, according to each religion on earth, there are billions of others (outsiders) who do not believe in the correct God, and who will therefore be punished, in some way, due to their non-belief in their specific conception of God. But how can anyone acknowledge "the right God" if they are completely unaware that this deity exists and wants certain things from them?

Now according to Christianity the following are true:

-A conscious personal being called Yahweh exists and created the universe and everything in it
-Yahweh is omnipotent, omniscient, and omni-benevolent
-Yahweh wants every person to know the truth and be saved
-Yahweh provided a means for every person to be saved
-But this being has not made it apparently and unequivocally known that the above are true

According to Christianity, in order for one to be saved it is necessary for one to think the following are true:

-Yahweh exists
-You have committed sins against him
-Yahweh is willing to save you from the punishments of those sins so that you can be saved

[These 3 will be called "X" herein]

But if Yahweh wants us to be saved, and wants us to know these "necessary" things, why don't we know them? I think the most reasonable position is that we (non-believers of X) don't know them because the Christian God does not exist.

The Argument:

P1 - If Yahweh exists he desires that we know X
P2 - If Yahweh exists he has the power for us to know X
P3 - If Yahweh exists, given 1&2, we should know X
P4 - We do not know X
C: Given 3&4 Yahweh does not exist


Possible Rebuttals:

1. But God doesn't want to "force himself" on us. He gave us freewill which would be violated if he just showed up and made us all know X.

Response: Knowledge does not negate choice. Even Christians agree that God demonstrated himself to angels, the prophets, the apostles, etc. So just b/c one has knowledge of a thing doesn't at all negate our freewill to choose to follow or obey.


2. All non-believers in Christianity are actually "secret believers". They "suppress the truth in unrighteousness" and know X but refuse to acknowledge them.

Response: Many non-Christians and/or non-theists display ample demonstrable evidence that they are actively seeking the truth and badly want to know God (who/whatever "it" is) in as close a relationship as possible (as well as know X). Where is the evidence that people are secretly Christians, let alone theists? It seems there just isn't any good reason for thinking this claim is true.

3. We are sinners, and b/c of sin we refuse to acknowledge Yahweh as Lord and repent.

Response: This response is similar to #2. There simply is no reason for thinking that all non-believers of Christianity/"Jesus is Lord" around the world are somehow incapable of connecting with an omnipotent deity merely because they are "sinful fallen beings" (short of merely assuming what needs to be proved). Isn't Satan a sinful fallen angel? What about all the angels who supposedly saw Yahweh and still rebelled? They must know he exists. How about Judas Escariot?

In addition, it seems quite contradictory to say that God wants us to know X but that we still don't know X due to our "sin". Are we more powerful than Yahweh (an omnipotent being)? Obviously, according to believers, this being has no problem with demonstrating the whole of nature to us, in a way that we can actively seek knowledge without necessarily having certainty of it. So why not demonstrate himself to us in the same way - so that (at the very least come judgment day) we won't have an excuse.

4. It's all part of his divine plan. For those who do not believe, Yahweh will eventually reveal himself to all of us at some point (perhaps at the of the earth) and there will be none who claim not to know X.

Response: This is the typical answer when one has no good answer. It is akin to saying, "I just have faith" which doesn't get anyone anywhere b/c anyone can 'just have faith' in anything. This response is insufficient because it leads to answering an apparent contradiction by a mere personal promise which is derived in the very assumption the Christian has made in his/her bible. "Oh, sometime out there we'll know later." It doesn't bring us any closer to a resolution to the problem.

So then Yahweh does not want us to know, and act in accordance with, X right now? He would rather us continue "in our sins" and not do "his will", preferring rather that we do "the work of the evil one" here on earth? This seems quite contrary to the message that Yahweh allegedly wants all his "children" to be saved (and to be saved right now) and do his will. Do you think your God does not want non-believers to be saved right now?

5. Yahweh wishes that all would be saved but that is not possible because he only chooses a few. We don't know why but we just believe and trust the bible.

Response: But why trust the bible? What sound evidence do you have that this collection of ancient writings in divine? Can you provide anything uniquely sound that cannot also be said of other claimed holy books? In a round about way this response seems to admit that the bible contradicts itself (for example that God wishes that none should perish, 2 Peter 3, but that he has prepared some for "destruction", Romans 9). Why should we put ANY trust (let alone our entire lives) in this belief system? There seems no good reason we ought to do so.

So then once more, the existence of non-belief is contradictory to the idea that Yahweh exists, because if it did we should except to see far greater numbers of "saved" Christians (indeed ALL people) and far less "souls burning in hell". Therefore we ought to feel confident in thinking that this being called Yahweh is not real.
[Image: AtheistForumsSig.jpg]
Reply
#2
RE: The Argument From Nonbelief
My friend, you jump through many hoops to say that "some people believe a lot of stupid shit."
Reply
#3
RE: The Argument From Nonbelief
Including atheists.... Undecided
Reply
#4
RE: The Argument From Nonbelief
(April 16, 2013 at 5:16 pm)median Wrote: MAIN CONTENTION:

P1 - If Yahweh exists he desires that we know X
P2 - If Yahweh exists he has the power for us to know X
P3 - If Yahweh exists, given 1&2, we should know X
P4 - We do not know X

And to make it worse, he continually handicaps each succeeding generation more and more.

Every generation, more and more things once attributed to Yahweh are being explained via natural mechanisms.

He refuses to revisit the Earth as he did many times in the past. He lets his 'word' transmitted orally for decades, or centuries with regards to the OT, which he should have known would cause mistakes. Then He has his 'word' written in ancient languages, which he should have known would be susceptible to mistranslations.

He knows where to find me, he knows what it would take to convince me of his existence.

You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Reply
#5
RE: The Argument From Nonbelief
(April 16, 2013 at 5:32 pm)catfish Wrote: Including atheists.... Undecided

Keep looking for your fucking god. When you find him, take a picture or something for those of us who think you're nuts.
Reply
#6
RE: The Argument From Nonbelief
(April 16, 2013 at 5:35 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Then He has his 'word' written in ancient languages, which he should have known would be susceptible to mistranslations.

Which is only an issue because he created many languages when he confused the builders of the Tower of Babel. Because, apparently, he didn't cotton to the idea of a unified humanity trying to accomplish great things.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
#7
RE: The Argument From Nonbelief
I think most religious people are just credulous, plain and simple. They can't possibly stand to think about a life that ends after death. And so they are driven to intellectual laziness due to the strong emotional drive to "just know". Except, in that process of trying to figure it all out they wind up believing nonsense because they are emotionally vulnerable, impatient, and gullible. We have seen this over and over throughout the history of religions. The funniest part is that in spite of the fact that most religious people (I mean theists) would admit that ALL the other religions around the world are man-made, fictional, and false - theirs is the only true one (and...it JUST so happens that they grew up with that religion in their culture!). So basically, we KNOW (as much as we can know nearly anything) that men have consistently concocted bullshit religions for one purpose or another. But somehow THEIR religious set of ancient writings is the correct one. It's so sad how they can't see this inconsistency.

I think it's pretty clear. If God wanted us to know he existed and "be saved" that WOULD be the case. Since it is not, we are well within our rational limits to hold that this God simply does not exist.
[Image: AtheistForumsSig.jpg]
Reply
#8
RE: The Argument From Nonbelief
Dude, if you wanted to insult theists, then just insult them.
This psuedo-intellectual "logic" is a waste of space and time.

I think it's pretty clear, you're just looking for an excuse to put other people down because your life is a miserable, pittiful existence.

You can fuck off now...
Reply
#9
RE: The Argument From Nonbelief
(April 17, 2013 at 5:36 pm)catfish Wrote: Dude, if you wanted to insult theists, then just insult them.

A theist getting insulted on an atheist site...who would have ever thunk it


Quote:I think it's pretty clear, you're just looking for an excuse to put other people down......

I got to agree with you here...because you never do thatThinking


Quote:.......because your life is a miserable, pittiful existence.

This coming from a guy who set up camp over here in this atheistic,miserable,pittiful wasteland.


Quote:You can fuck off now...
Tiger peace brother
[Image: tumblr_mliut3rXE01soz1kco1_500.jpg]

The trouble with the world is not that people know too little, but that they know so many things that ain't so.
-- Mark Twain

.

Reply
#10
RE: The Argument From Nonbelief
(April 17, 2013 at 5:36 pm)catfish Wrote: I think it's pretty clear, you're just looking for an excuse to put other people down because your life is a miserable, pittiful existence.

You can fuck off now...

"And they will know we are Christians by our love, by our looooove!"

Angel Cloud
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Telling Religious Family About Nonbelief sarcasticface 17 5125 March 14, 2013 at 10:50 am
Last Post: ATL



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)