Conflicting statements in the bible

[downbeatplumb]

Nope, God is the foundation for all knowledge and reasoning.)

Wow I mean wow, how wrong can one man be.

[Minimalist]

In Waldork's case there is no knowledge or reasoning so a non-existent god could well be his model.

The rest of us are stuck with the real world, though. No room for fucking gods.

[Ryantology]

This couldn’t be more wrong. Christian epistemology does not possess any fatal flaws, so by pointing out the flaws in empiricism I am really magnifying the merits of my own view of reality.

I cannot argue that your viewpoints apply only to your own view of reality, but that's such a lonely place to be.

[The Reality Salesman01]

Having no criteria from which to to distinguish existance from non-existance, it doesn't sound like a reality at all! I'm not sure he knows how to recognize whether or not he's in a real place or one that doesn't exist, to him...one is not discernible from the other.

[Statler Waldorf]

Wow I mean wow, how wrong can one man be.

Try to postulate a purely non-Christian and naturalistic epistemology and we can certainly find out. :-P

In Waldork's case there is no knowledge or reasoning so a non-existent god could well be his model.

The rest of us are stuck with the real world, though. No room for fucking gods.

You have no clue what the real world is.

I cannot argue that your viewpoints apply only to your own view of reality, but that's such a lonely place to be.

Yup, lonely me and 2.3 billion other people on Earth, lol.

Having no criteria from which to to distinguish existance from non-existance, it doesn't sound like a reality at all! I'm not sure he knows how to recognize whether or not he's in a real place or one that doesn't exist, to him...one is not discernible from the other.

Without being able to explain how you can trust your senses, your memory, induction, your ability to reason, and the laws of deductive logic you have no criteria for reality; you’ve adopted a view of reality that is utterly indefensible. The funniest part is that you were so busy trying to defend your self-refuting and therefore false criteria for truth and reality that you never bothered to ask me if I had a criteria or not. The fact your criteria utterly fails does not prove that I do not have a logically coherent and cogent criteria; such arrogance amongst fools.

[Anomalocaris]

You'd love it, Asswipe. You might learn something!

Valiantly thou you might try to stuff some minuscule amount of enlightenment between his bible addled ears, there would simply be no brain there to receive them.

[Statler Waldorf]

You'd love it, Asswipe. You might learn something!

Valiantly thou you might try to stuff some minuscule amount of enlightenment between his bible addled ears, there would simply be no brain there to receive them.

All Bible believers are brainless? You sound so ridiculous when you say things like that. You should actually try to defend your position for once; we both know that you cannot and that’s why you resort to this form of coping mechanism.

[The Grand Nudger]

Fortunately for bible believers, you aren't "all" of them. Though it would be nice if you were, granted.

[Statler Waldorf]

Fortunately for bible believers, you aren't "all" of them. Though it would be nice if you were, granted.

The original comment was not directed at me. All Bible believers do believe the Bible though.

[Neo-Scholastic]

Without being able to explain how you can trust your senses, your memory, induction, your ability to reason, and the laws of deductive logic you have no criteria for reality

Christians do not have a monopoly on epistemology.