Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 18, 2024, 8:42 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Illuminati
RE: The Illuminati
If you really want to know who the Illuminati are click <LINK REMOVED>

This website is not for the faint of heart.
Reply
RE: The Illuminati
(August 4, 2013 at 11:10 am)The Meritocrat Wrote: If you really want to know who the Illuminati are click here.

This website is not for the faint of heart.

That is deeply delusional.
ROFLOL
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: The Illuminati
(August 4, 2013 at 11:28 am)Chas Wrote:
(August 4, 2013 at 11:10 am)The Meritocrat Wrote: If you really want to know who the Illuminati are click here.

This website is not for the faint of heart.

That is deeply delusional.
ROFLOL

That website is comprised of roughly 2 million words which disclose topics such as psychology, mathematics, science, religion, epistemology, philosophy, etc in a rational attempt to explain the meaning of life.

How is the greatest website on the web delusional?
Reply
RE: The Illuminati
(August 4, 2013 at 11:32 am)The Meritocrat Wrote:
(August 4, 2013 at 11:28 am)Chas Wrote: That is deeply delusional.
ROFLOL

That website is comprised of roughly 2 million words which disclose topics such as psychology, mathematics, science, religion, epistemology, philosophy, etc in a rational attempt to explain the meaning of life.

How is the greatest website on the web delusional?

The site is full of misunderstanding and bad logic.
Quote: It appears that Dawkins didn't realise what he was doing since he is firmly opposed to teleological arguments. However, in his "weasel" example to demonstrate the power and speed of evolution, he uses a definite end (telos) to direct the entire process. Unlike Dawkins, we would never assert that a known end-point directs evolution. It is bizarre that an atheist biologist chooses such an argument to illustrate his case.
This is a complete misunderstanding of what Dawkins was saying. This is a toy example to show the power of accumulated change, nothing more.

Quote:What happened to Pythagoras's mysterious secret society (whose roots extend far back to the dawn of human civilisation and whose ancient adepts included Solomon the Apostate, the genius who heroically tried to kill Jehovah, the monstrous Torture God)? It became known as the Illuminati - the enlightened ones - and it has survived to this day, despite relentless Abrahamic persecution. Mithraism, alchemy, hermeticism, the Gnostic religion of the medieval Cathar heretics, the outlawed Knights Templar and the original anti-establishment Freemasonry (nothing like pro-establishment modern WASP Freemasonry) were all guises of the Illuminati.

Mathematics doesn't rule the universe - mathematics is bounded by the laws of physics. There are no mystical, magical numbers.


And on and on. Mystical hogwash.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: The Illuminati
(August 4, 2013 at 11:44 am)Chas Wrote:
(August 4, 2013 at 11:32 am)The Meritocrat Wrote: That website is comprised of roughly 2 million words which disclose topics such as psychology, mathematics, science, religion, epistemology, philosophy, etc in a rational attempt to explain the meaning of life.

How is the greatest website on the web delusional?

The site is full of misunderstanding and bad logic.
Quote: It appears that Dawkins didn't realise what he was doing since he is firmly opposed to teleological arguments. However, in his "weasel" example to demonstrate the power and speed of evolution, he uses a definite end (telos) to direct the entire process. Unlike Dawkins, we would never assert that a known end-point directs evolution. It is bizarre that an atheist biologist chooses such an argument to illustrate his case.
This is a complete misunderstanding of what Dawkins was saying. This is a toy example to show the power of accumulated change, nothing more.
How is it a misunderstanding?

Quote:What happened to Pythagoras's mysterious secret society (whose roots extend far back to the dawn of human civilisation and whose ancient adepts included Solomon the Apostate, the genius who heroically tried to kill Jehovah, the monstrous Torture God)? It became known as the Illuminati - the enlightened ones - and it has survived to this day, despite relentless Abrahamic persecution. Mithraism, alchemy, hermeticism, the Gnostic religion of the medieval Cathar heretics, the outlawed Knights Templar and the original anti-establishment Freemasonry (nothing like pro-establishment modern WASP Freemasonry) were all guises of the Illuminati.
[/quote]
Mathematics doesn't rule the universe - mathematics is bounded by the laws of physics. There are no mystical, magical numbers.

And on and on. Mystical hogwash.
[/quote]

Then why come the laws of physics go haywire when it comes to black holes? Also, imaginary numbers.
Reply
RE: The Illuminati
(August 4, 2013 at 11:10 am)The Meritocrat Wrote: If you really want to know who the Illuminati are click here.

Armageddonconspiracy.co.uk Wrote:The Armageddon Conspiracy
The End of Christianity
The End of Islam

These illuminati people don't sound too bad.
ronedee Wrote:Science doesn't have a good explaination for water

[Image: YAAgdMk.gif]



Reply
RE: The Illuminati
(August 4, 2013 at 12:26 pm)CleanShavenJesus Wrote:
(August 4, 2013 at 11:10 am)The Meritocrat Wrote: If you really want to know who the Illuminati are click here.

Armageddonconspiracy.co.uk Wrote:The Armageddon Conspiracy
The End of Christianity
The End of Islam

These illuminati people don't sound too bad.

Although huge, it is a website worth reading.
Reply
RE: The Illuminati
(August 4, 2013 at 11:47 am)The Meritocrat Wrote:
Chas Wrote:Mathematics doesn't rule the universe - mathematics is bounded by the laws of physics. There are no mystical, magical numbers.

And on and on. Mystical hogwash.

Then why come the laws of physics go haywire when it comes to black holes? Also, imaginary numbers.

Haywire? We don't have the physics or the math for the inside of a black hole because there is no basis to form them, that is, no data.
Imaginary numbers are used in quantum mechanics, so no haywire there.

(August 4, 2013 at 12:29 pm)The Meritocrat Wrote:
(August 4, 2013 at 12:26 pm)CleanShavenJesus Wrote: These illuminati people don't sound too bad.

Although huge, it is a website worth reading.

Worth reading for bad logic, poor understanding, and outright crazy ideas.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: The Illuminati
(August 4, 2013 at 12:29 pm)The Meritocrat Wrote: [quote='CleanShavenJesus' pid='488231' dateline='1375633570']



Although huge, it is a website worth reading.

For the laughs.
Reply
RE: The Illuminati
Do the words "The last post in this thread was made over 30 days ago. Please consider starting a new thread." mean anything to you?
[Image: thfrog.gif]



Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Would you vote for it and is it fair, to have the Illuminati pay their share? Greatest I am 22 7668 April 28, 2013 at 6:58 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)