Quote:Godschild Wrote: It is the spiritual needs God's concerned about
Yeah - those "spiritual needs" ( a xtian term meaning bullshit) cost the preachers nothing. Enough to fool dolts like you, G-C.
the so fallible Bible
|
Quote:Godschild Wrote: It is the spiritual needs God's concerned about Yeah - those "spiritual needs" ( a xtian term meaning bullshit) cost the preachers nothing. Enough to fool dolts like you, G-C. Drich Wrote:Not billions of years. Simply that there is no time line between Genesis 2 and 3. Which again could have been a day or a trillion years. Your evolution + literal Garden theory implies that God *planned* to throw humanity out of the Garden. For A&E to successfully mate with "monkey man", they would of had to enter the real world at a *specific* point in time when "monkey man" was genetically compatible. Assuming that God isn't 100% incapable of creating something that fails, he must have timed the entire ordeal so that humanity wouldn't die out with A&E (via inbreeding) but instead gave them the opportunity to populate earth by mating with monkey men. It really doesn't matter how you slice this Christianity deal. Moral of the story: God is evil. "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
(October 8, 2013 at 12:28 am)FallentoReason Wrote:According to who's standard?Drich Wrote:Not billions of years. Simply that there is no time line between Genesis 2 and 3. Which again could have been a day or a trillion years. (October 8, 2013 at 12:37 am)Drich Wrote:(October 8, 2013 at 12:28 am)FallentoReason Wrote: Your evolution + literal Garden theory implies that God *planned* to throw humanity out of the Garden. For A&E to successfully mate with "monkey man", they would of had to enter the real world at a *specific* point in time when "monkey man" was genetically compatible. Assuming that God isn't 100% incapable of creating something that fails, he must have timed the entire ordeal so that humanity wouldn't die out with A&E (via inbreeding) but instead gave them the opportunity to populate earth by mating with monkey men.According to who's standard? Address the issue Drich. You avoid more issues than agents avoided bullets in the Matrix. "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
RE: the so fallible Bible
October 8, 2013 at 12:39 am
(This post was last modified: October 8, 2013 at 12:40 am by Lion IRC.)
(October 7, 2013 at 8:01 pm)ThomM Wrote: Actually - the ten commandments are NOT original to the bible.. THIS TEN? 1. I, the Lord, am your God. You shall not have other gods besides me. 2. You shall not take the name of the Lord God in vain 3. Remember to keep holy the Lord's Day 4. Honor your father and your mother 5. You shall not kill 6. You shall not commit adultery 7. You shall not steal 8. You shall not bear false witness 9. You shall not covet your neighbor's wife 10. You shall not covet your neighbor's goods Show me this list earlier and elsewhere than the Hebrew bible. (October 7, 2013 at 8:01 pm)ThomM Wrote: ...nor is the so called GOLDEN RULE _ which long predates the bible. The golden rule as it appears throughout the Old Testament does predate the WRITTEN bible and was practiced by God's people long before the words ever appeared in print form. You are confusing the age of the printed bible with the periods of time written ABOUT in the bible which happened long before. (October 8, 2013 at 12:39 am)Lion IRC Wrote: The golden rule as it appears throughout the Old Testament does predate the WRITTEN bible and was practiced by God's people long before the words ever appeared in print form. Still nothing special about it. http://www.religioustolerance.org/reciproc2.htm "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
RE: the so fallible Bible
October 8, 2013 at 12:53 am
(This post was last modified: October 8, 2013 at 12:54 am by Minimalist.)
You two shitheads are embarrassing yourselves.
The OT was based on an "eye for an eye" whereas your xtian shit is supposedly based on "turning the other cheek" not that you fuckers ever follow that one. This bunch of xtian shits at least knows what they are talking about. http://www.2pi.info/bible/god/gods-chang...Cheek.html Quote:4. Eye for an Eye or Turn the Other Cheek Maybe you guys should sign up there for lessons. YOu need them. RE: the so fallible Bible
October 8, 2013 at 12:54 am
(This post was last modified: October 8, 2013 at 12:55 am by Lion IRC.)
(October 8, 2013 at 12:47 am)FallentoReason Wrote: Still nothing special about it. Nothing special about treating others as you would have them treat you? I think that is a VERY SPECIAL moral admonishment. If we didnt value our fellow humans we would have no need for words like "ethics", "humanism", "altruism", ''philanthropy''.... (October 8, 2013 at 12:54 am)Lion IRC Wrote:(October 8, 2013 at 12:47 am)FallentoReason Wrote: Still nothing special about it. Ok... clearly you didn't follow the link. The Golden Rule is found in plenty of other cultures that predate the Hebrews. "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
Quote:Nothing special about treating others as you would have them treat you? Your fucking jesus didn't think of it. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? | Whateverist | 143 | 50664 |
March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am Last Post: Gwaithmir |
|
Illinois bible colleges: "We shouldn't have to follow state standards because bible!" | Esquilax | 34 | 8254 |
January 23, 2015 at 12:29 pm Last Post: Spooky |