Posts: 13
Threads: 1
Joined: November 21, 2009
Reputation:
1
RE: Hitler and the Holocaust
November 21, 2009 at 6:07 pm
Just to clarify,
In Mein Kampf, hitler first put over the idea of the final solution and supported it
with the Darwins Theory of Evolution and the concept of survival of the fittest
as a prime justification for the supremacy of the Aryan race.
Now i could assume as well that this tied in with his hatred to his own (so i hear) jewish heritage....
but you know what happens when we assume
True story.
And aside from some gaping holes i find some real value in the theory of evolution. So im no hater,
just hoping to provide some knowledge on the matter.
peace
kavon
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Hitler and the Holocaust
November 21, 2009 at 7:20 pm
And, um, what "gaping holes" might those be?
Posts: 13
Threads: 1
Joined: November 21, 2009
Reputation:
1
RE: Hitler and the Holocaust
November 21, 2009 at 7:37 pm
well one and the most obvious is the fact that the primary modus through wich life thrives
is not natural selection and survival of the fittest as is commonley posited, but rather
the perpetual search for progressively more unity. this prime fact had been severly overlooked.
and from the seven trillion independent cells working in unison towards the harmonious function of the whole within your own body, to the multitudes of species fullfilling their niche in the ecosystem
constantly fluctuating to maintain a perfect balance or homeostasis,
this is the primariy goal of evolution.
progressive unity towards achieving peak life supporting efficiency.
peace
kavon
Posts: 4349
Threads: 385
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
57
RE: Hitler and the Holocaust
November 21, 2009 at 7:40 pm
Evolution does not have any form of goal, primary or otherwise. It simply favours those adaptations that allow it to migrate dna to the next generation.
Posts: 13
Threads: 1
Joined: November 21, 2009
Reputation:
1
RE: Hitler and the Holocaust
November 21, 2009 at 7:51 pm
that is where he is mistaken.
there is no thing observable by any being that can be found to be a purposless.
that is another glaring hole. Everything, particularly in nature can be found to have a function
relevant to the whole, even appendages that we have deemed obsolete are now proving functional to a greater or lesser degree.
Thus if the aggregates have function, or purpose, so to must the whole.
Darwin provided a valuable and relevant blueprint, but he made many understandable errors.
peace
kavon