Satanism is the ONLY Rational Religion

[Esquilax]

Sin doesn't mean the occasional indulgence in things you enjoy it means fucking up and causing harm to someone or something.

Sweet, so according to that, I haven't really sinned. Nice.

*Waits to hear how any sin is harmful to god, as if that makes sense and doesn't invalidate the sentiment above entirely.*

[Zen Badger]

There's nothing rational about the rejection of the Creator

You mean the creator that you can't provide any evidence for??

Quite.....

[Sword of Christ]

You mean the creator that you can't provide any evidence for??

Quite.....

Evidence yes absolute proof no. So it's evidence you reject as being because you would rather believe something else.

[Zen Badger]

You mean the creator that you can't provide any evidence for??

Quite.....

Evidence yes absolute proof no. So it's evidence you reject as being because you would rather believe something else.

Really? And what would I rather believe?

And what evidence do you have that you think I would reject?

[Esquilax]

Evidence yes absolute proof no. So it's evidence you reject as being because you would rather believe something else.

I love how you christians always need to spin our rejection of your nonsense into some conscious, biased choice on our part, instead of maybe, just maybe, attempting to examine the actual reasons we state for doing so. It's just such a wonderful reminder of the position you enter into this debate with, where nobody who disagrees with you can ever even believe themselves to have a legitimate point, because they're all really doing it because they hate god, and so you don't have to honestly examine anything they say.

But please, do tell us this evidence that we reject for no good reason. I'm up for a laugh. Let's see how closely you'll engage with the feedback we give you.

[Sword of Christ]

I love how you christians always need to spin our rejection of your nonsense into some conscious, biased choice on our part, instead of maybe, just maybe, attempting to examine the actual reasons we state for doing so. It's just such a wonderful reminder of the position you enter into this debate with, where nobody who disagrees with you can ever even believe themselves to have a legitimate point, because they're all really doing it because they hate god, and so you don't have to honestly examine anything they say.

If you already decided that you will only ever accept strict scientific evidence for God to begin with and it's impossible to have strict scientific evidence for God because God isn't physically existent then you can't really simply claim that there is no evidence for God. There are certain kinds of evidence which you already decided not to accept in favor of evidence that can't exist so.

But please, do tell us this evidence that we reject for no good reason.

Philosophical evidence, historical evidence, subjective evidence, Biblical evidence. You can't have scientific evidence for God, though certainly what science has revealed about the universe so far demonstrates an incredible amount complex structure and well ordered balance. It gets to the point when a random chance coincidence would be more incredible than God.

I'm up for a laugh. Let's see how closely you'll engage with the feedback we give you.

Here you go.

[LastPoet]

[Sword of Christ]

I may as well ask you for the evidence of atheism/materialism, you can't produce evidence for that either it's your belief/philosophy which you have for what you consider to be good reasons. You will need something you can physically observe and test in order to obtain scientific evidence. You can't do that to God and you can't do that to literally nothing that doesn't exist.

[KUSA]

I may as well ask you for the evidence of atheism/materialism, you can't produce evidence for that either it's your belief/philosophy which you have for what you consider to be good reasons. You will need something you can physically observe and test in order to obtain scientific evidence. You can't do that to God and you can't do that to literally nothing that doesn't exist.

The evidence is there is no god, no miracles, no witnesses to anything. Nothing, nothing, nothing!

[EgoRaptor]

I love how you christians always need to spin our rejection of your nonsense into some conscious, biased choice on our part, instead of maybe, just maybe, attempting to examine the actual reasons we state for doing so. It's just such a wonderful reminder of the position you enter into this debate with, where nobody who disagrees with you can ever even believe themselves to have a legitimate point, because they're all really doing it because they hate god, and so you don't have to honestly examine anything they say.

If you already decided that you will only ever accept strict scientific evidence for God to begin with and it's impossible to have strict scientific evidence for God because God isn't physically existent then you can't really simply claim that there is no evidence for God. There are certain kinds of evidence which you already decided not to accept in favor of evidence that can't exist so.

I think you just admitted that god doesn't exist.