I need a volunteer

[Fidel_Castronaut]

He doesn't know how form a coherent sentence so I think it might be a bit much asking him to reply properly.

Eh, what you expect from a school dropout like me?
I realize that i am not very good in forming COHERENT SENTENCES and in many other things that is why i need your help in understanding few things.
1) What is the difference between spirituality and religion?
2) Where philosophy eventually lead to?
3) Can real progress happen within this physical world?
I know how busy you are but please enlighten me if you can.
Thanks.

Sorry my universal translator must be playing up. It appears to be unable to decipher dumbass.

[Little Rik]

Eh, what you expect from a school dropout like me?
I realize that i am not very good in forming COHERENT SENTENCES and in many other things that is why i need your help in understanding few things.
1) What is the difference between spirituality and religion?
2) Where philosophy eventually lead to?
3) Can real progress happen within this physical world?
I know how busy you are but please enlighten me if you can.
Thanks.

Sorry my universal translator must be playing up. It appears to be unable to decipher dumbass.

I am so sad to hear that there is a problem with your translator.
It is a pity because once it would be translated i know for sure that you wouldn't have any problem at all in answer my questions.
Never mind i can wait.

[BrokenQuill92]

I didn't understand this at all, did Voice Over misread something?

[Angrboda]

But then, simpletons like to grab at any straw, such as the patently absurd, "It's from Wikipedia, therefore there's something wrong with it!"

Actually i didn't really said that the information you took from wiki was wrong.

Liar.

Not all the information coming from Wiki are incorrect but many are....

-and-

4) Taking from wiki facts as real when in reality wiki in that particular case took from media and media took information from corrupted police.

So you said Wikipedia is many times wrong, and that the specific facts I told about Ananda Margis were wrong. The former claim you've just lied about having made, and you've never given any actual example of how the information I sourced from Wikipedia was factually incorrect. Sarkar was convicted and many people do say nasty things about Ananda Margis. Both are verifiably true. The following are verifiable facts; Ananda Margis, rightly or wrongly, was associated with the Hilton bombings by others, and people did blame Ananda Margis for the Bijon Setu massacre. As usual, you have enormous assertions, but you're short on being able to actually back them up.

During Sarkar's incarceration in the 1970s the organization became associated with terrorist activity, particularly the Sydney Hilton bombing. [Described by Parliament as Australia's only known incident of domestic terrorism.]

On the morning of April 30, 1982, a nun and 16 Ananda Marga monks were dragged out of taxis that were taking them to an educational conference at their headquarters in Tiljala in Kolkata's southern suburbs. At three spots simultaneously, they were beaten to death and then set on fire. The killings were witnessed by thousands of people. ... The Statesman Weekly reported the state's Chief Minister's suspicious that the attack had been staged to embarrass the party in power prior to the upcoming election. Ananda Marga blamed the attack on the Communist Party of India (Marxist) .... Narasingha Sil discusses at length the state of the reputation of Ananda Marga in the years and months leading up to the massacre. [Narasingha Sil] describes how members of Ananda Marga had engaged in many acts of violence (including murders of members leaving the group)...

The facts quoted above are beyond dispute.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

I didn't understand this at all, did Voice Over misread something?

Good to know Enrico doesn't make any sense regardless of whether you can see what he's writing or not.

He's just another clown, BQ, nothing to worry about.

[Bad Wolf]

He's one of those gifts that just keep giving

[Little Rik]

The facts quoted above are beyond dispute.

It is well known that history is usually written by the winner but at the very end justice is always restored and the karma law work all the time.
Unfortunately most people never understand why someone born healthy and in a good nick while other born blind cripple or down in the gutter.
They wouldn't know why Indira Gandhi and his son were butchered down.
Nobody would tell you also what happened to those jews who put Christ in the cross.
The facts reported by the media run by the conservative government would not also tell you that the persecution against Ananda Marga was all about PROUT or the system that would put an end to endemic corruption in India and elsewhere but it is your choice to believe the media run by various corrupted gov.
So good lack to you in your effort to keep on masturbating your gray jelly inside your skull.

[Bad Wolf]

Why are you so sure karma exists? Why does there have to be balance?
Look at Hitler. He killed 6 million jews, gypsies and homosexuals. Thats not even taking into account everyone who died in the war. And at the end of it, he just died....... Where is the justice in that? How is that balance? Dying is easy, why did he not suffer for his crimes?

[Esquilax]

It may sound strange to you but many of the most successful people in all field of life are school dropouts.

No, many of the most successful people in life are those that have something to offer; that's why you, school dropout or not, are not successful at all. And it's also the reason why your much-pimped author opted to write a book of pseudoscience and publish it sans any form of scientific research or accreditation, rather than attempt to get it peer reviewed- which, to be clear, could be done if her work had any information or content that matched reality- so that her "findings" could be applied to science and maybe help some people. It's interesting, then, that she opted to use her worldview altering scientific discovery to toil in obscurity, rather than bringing that information to the masses using the established scientific apparatus that could have helped to publicize and utilize her work practically.

I'll wait for the usual accusations of a conspiracy in mainstream science from you, but until then, I'll note that the reason none of that happened is that you're full of shit.

I usually judge by whether the opinions expressed agree with my own, not by the qualification.

Fixed that for you.

The best knowledge is achieved by intuitional science which is not taught at the uni but of course you are free to believe the opposite.

And again, I'm forced to ask you to name a single scientific discovery or peer reviewed research work that has been made using "intuitional science," something I've requested multiple times, and you've failed to so much as acknowledge that I've done so. Perhaps you're attempting to hide something?

[Angrboda]

The facts quoted above are beyond dispute.

It is well known that history is usually written by the winner but at the very end justice is always restored and the karma law work all the time.
.....
The facts reported by the media run by the conservative government would not also tell you that the persecution against Ananda Marga was all about PROUT or the system that would put an end to endemic corruption in India and elsewhere but it is your choice to believe the media run by various corrupted gov.
So good lack to you in your effort to keep on masturbating your gray jelly inside your skull.

So, your answer, lacking all evidence, is that it was a conspiracy against P.R.Sarkar and Ananda Margis from those meanies who didn't want people to prosper using PROUT?

Just so that I know that we're squarely in "tin foil hat" territory. Thanks a bunch, enrico. You're a hoot.