Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 25, 2024, 11:16 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
My frustration with "Strong Female" Characters
#21
RE: My frustration with "Strong Female" Characters
I don't read too much, or watch much television. I go out to sporting events, and a lot of them are women's. I like soccer, for instance. That is a very tough sport, especially on the knees. Back at Sacramento State, I got to know several of the women's team members somewhat well. One of the toughest girls on the team was rather a girly girl. Had a naturally very young face, and always always always wore either a pink or school colored bow in her hair. Cute but killer. I love that combo. Don't need to sacrafice one for the other.
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
Reply
#22
RE: My frustration with "Strong Female" Characters
(January 10, 2014 at 11:47 pm)c172 Wrote: I don't read too much, or watch much television. I go out to sporting events, and a lot of them are women's. I like soccer, for instance. That is a very tough sport, especially on the knees. Back at Sacramento State, I got to know several of the women's team members somewhat well. One of the toughest girls on the team was rather a girly girl. Had a naturally very young face, and always always always wore either a pink or school colored bow in her hair. Cute but killer. I love that combo. Don't need to sacrafice one for the other.

I have a ex who was girly as they come, but she would beat the fucking hell out of everyone playing hockey.

To answer to OP. It is because they are productions run by executives that care about the bottom line and they prefer a mediocre movie with a mediocre profit then something truly memorable (Original Star Trek any one?)
Incidentally I just finished watching a episode of BSG, and I think roslin is one of the most interesting characters I can think of in any show.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Reply
#23
RE: My frustration with "Strong Female" Characters
(January 10, 2014 at 7:19 am)BrokenQuill92 Wrote: In today's media why in order to have a strong female character does there need to be such a hatred for traditional female roles. Why can't the strong female character not like getting dirty? Or think pink is pretty? Have a love for shopping? Or squeal over sparkly things without being called stupid? It seems to me now being a strong female character means being a man with boobs.

That's easy, in a reactionary kind of way; if those traditionally feminine roles are what was associated with female characters before, and those old characters are weak female characters, then strong female characters must be the opposite of those things!

That's the problem; writers mistaking the tropes for how they're used. The reason women had been relegated to a set of archetypes within fiction had nothing to do with their love for pink or anything, and everything to do with the role they were given in the narrative. It's pretty easy to see how someone might mistake those feminine things as being the source of the problem, given that in many cases it was all those female characters had.

But that still doesn't fix anything, it just establishes a false dichotomy: characters that associate with X = bad. Characters that associate with not X = good. Handily, this completely misses the point: we're not after strong female characters, we're after interesting characters in general, irrespective of gender. To say "these are the traits that make a bad female character," is to merely define yet another stereotypical type of fictional woman into existence; just another stock character of the type one typically tries to escape from when designing male characters.

I don't understand why so many people seem to mistake "approaching three dimensional" as being the hallmark of a strong female character. It's far easier than that; just stop treating tits like something that transform a personality into a specific set of shapes. Just write for people, goddamn it. Tongue
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#24
RE: My frustration with "Strong Female" Characters
(January 10, 2014 at 7:19 am)BrokenQuill92 Wrote: In today's media why in order to have a strong female character does there need to be such a hatred for traditional female roles. Why can't the strong female character not like getting dirty? Or think pink is pretty? Have a love for shopping? Or squeal over sparkly things without being called stupid? It seems to me now being a strong female character means being a man with boobs.

I am only replying to this opening query as I have not read the entire thread. My idea of a traditional woman is strong and not the least bit masculine. A traditional woman is one who embraces her feminine qualities without forsaking her strengths. She embraces her role as nurturer.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Muslim Rappers (Strong Lyrics, disturbing and sad) JohnDG 11 5107 September 15, 2012 at 2:10 pm
Last Post: JohnDG
  600 Hanna Barbera Characters Paul the Human 2 1079 September 4, 2010 at 9:09 am
Last Post: Welsh cake



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)