Well, this is new...

[Silver]

...to me, at least.

A particularly despicable Christian, and I use the term loosely here, has posted on another forum whereby she used the semantics of India to justify her all-too obvious bigotry.

What I understood about India

The anagram of india is: i and i

Two men cannot achieve it
Two women cannot achieve it

Only one man and one woman together can achieve it.

The eye of the penis meets the eye of the cervix.

In face to face unison, the two become as one and achieve a spiritual height that can only be known in this way.

Seeing I to I

Love is the master, never lust.

Love and lust do not mix.

Karmic debts prevent unification.

Cleansing and purification are mandatory.

*sinless*

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

...to me, at least.

A particularly despicable Christian, and I use the term loosely here, has posted on another forum whereby she used the semantics of India to justify her all-too obvious bigotry.

What I understood about India

The anagram of india is: i and i

Two men cannot achieve it
Two women cannot achieve it

Only one man and one woman together can achieve it.

The eye of the penis meets the eye of the cervix.

In face to face unison, the two become as one and achieve a spiritual height that can only be known in this way.

Seeing I to I

Love is the master, never lust.

Love and lust do not mix.

Karmic debts prevent unification.

Cleansing and purification are mandatory.

*sinless*

She has clearly never boned an Indian chick.

Boru

[Chad32]

I've heard of a dick being called a one eyed snake, but I've never heard of a cervix being an eye. Either way all that seems like insane troll logic.

There are cases where love can develop without lust, but in some cases love comes after lust. Mainly if you meet someone you find attractive, and want to get to know them as a potential lover. Now if your marriage was arranged first, or you met someone online before meeting them in person, or you met them before puberty, things might be different. Still, lust and love can mix because sometimes one blossoms from the other.

[NoraBrimstone]

That's insane. Like, literally insane.

I assume this was a homophobic point, yeah? "Homosexuality is wrong because.... India is an anagram of I and I..." What the effing crap?

Let me try something here. Britney Spears is an anagram of Presbyterians. Maybe her music can bring peace to NI!?

[Minimalist]

I thought the Indians called their country "Bharat" or something like that? I wonder what kind of anagram she could make out of that?

Your xtian sounds like the type who would say "if English was good enough for jesus its good enough for me."

Asshole.

[*Deidre*]

I'm so tired of the word, 'lust.' What exactly is the problem with wanting to have sex with someone else? Or thinking about sex? Or fantasizing?

The word lust seems to be an invented religious term, used by people who need to get laid...in a very bad way. And don't like feeling that way. There's nothing wrong with desiring sex. It's called being human. Of course, we can't act on every impulse we have, but that doesn't mean that the stirring within, is a bad thing. Only religious people see it as such. :/

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Britney Spears is an anagram of Presbyterians. Maybe her music can bring peace to NI!?

Sooner have the knee cappings.

Boru