RE: The fall of post invasion Iraq
September 2, 2014 at 10:33 pm
(This post was last modified: September 2, 2014 at 10:33 pm by Polaris.)
(September 1, 2014 at 11:19 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Still here, polecat? Do you expect Iraq to free itself from Isis without your help?
But the drums are beating more steadily. You should be delighted.
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/25923...-in-flight
Quote:Sound the bugle! Get the press to march along; we are going to war. Again! Enemies R ‘Us!
For a long time with the killing of bin Laden, a jihadi fatigue had set in. With the apparent shriveling up of the Al Qaeda menace, America’s threat-defining and -refining machinery was somewhat adrift. What had been so simple turned too complex to fuse into one sound-bite.
Former CIA official Thomas Fingar, now at Stanford University, describes his own frustration in finding out what U.S. policy priorities should be in national intelligence. He asked his colleagues to share the threats they worried about. He was soon inundated.
“When I was given responsibility for the process known as the National Intelligence Priorities Framework, almost 2,300 issues had been assigned priorities higher than zero, “ he explained. “My first instruction was, ‘Reduce the number’.”
He knew they needed only one bad-ass enemy to focus fears and attract appropriations to fight. He had too many threats to respond to. They had to go. Now, he and the Obama administration have that new bad guy: the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria or ISIS.
Who are you trying to fool, bagger? I bet you actually did vote for Bush, not once but twice and are ashamed to admit so.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.