FTL
June 12, 2014 at 11:31 am
(This post was last modified: June 12, 2014 at 11:53 am by Creed of Heresy.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 4:18 pm
Thread Rating:
|
FTL
|
|
Unless tampering with the fabric of reality might upset the apple cart, EVERYWHERE and EVERYWHEN.
And the supernova bomb from Krikkit . .
...These guys have never seen Event Horizon, have they?
Still, great advance... if it works.
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything? ![]() (June 12, 2014 at 1:55 pm)ShaMan Wrote: But... BUT! Wouldn't we be going backward rather than advancing? Backward relative to what? :S
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything? ![]()
I've seen this sort of thing before, about shifting an area of spacetime containing a spacecraft rather than the vehicle itself. As I recall, one of the minor drawbacks mentioned at the time was the immense power requirements, something like a single burst of energy greater than all the energy generated in human history. Apparently, such a release of energy would likely vaporise the Earth and probably the Sun as well.
I suspect - and hope - that all these stumbling blocks are overcome, within my lifetime for preference.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Quantum entanglement?
I don't think you can travel faster than something that is virtually instantaneous.
I do note that FTL is by implication not instantaneous.
I'm not sure the objections to violating relativity etc. etc. etc., would apply to a transportation scheme that was instantaneous. Not that that helps actually do it. I'll go fetch some Legos . . . . . |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Debate on FTL Neutrinos hosted by Neil Degrasse Tyson | NoMoreFaith | 1 | 2263 |
March 20, 2012 at 7:19 pm Last Post: Categories+Sheaves |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)




![[Image: LB_Header_Idea_A.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i280.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fkk172%2FBlaziken_rjcf%2FLB_Header_Idea_A.jpg)

