Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation:
104
RE: Tacitus
August 19, 2014 at 3:45 am
(August 19, 2014 at 3:41 am)revivin Wrote: (August 19, 2014 at 3:39 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: assertions
When I read the NT I think there are some facts we can glean from it. One of those facts is out of all the epistles of Paul, one thing is sure, he believed he spent 15 days with Peter and they both shared the experience of believing they saw Jesus resurrected to groups.
Reported for spam.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Tacitus
August 19, 2014 at 3:46 am
(August 19, 2014 at 3:43 am)revivin Wrote: (August 19, 2014 at 3:41 am)Esquilax Wrote: Given that multiple corroborations form the basis of every other religion too
No other religion has eyewitness testimony in various groups of resurrection.
Nor does christianity: none of the gospel writers ever met Jesus.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 105
Threads: 2
Joined: August 19, 2014
Reputation:
0
RE: Tacitus
August 19, 2014 at 3:48 am
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2014 at 3:52 am by revivin.)
(August 19, 2014 at 3:46 am)Esquilax Wrote: Nor does christianity: none of the gospel writers ever met Jesus.
There is no reason to believe that. I only have evidence for the NT written by the eyewitnesses and those closest to them.
What better evidence could you ask for?
Posts: 1298
Threads: 42
Joined: January 2, 2012
Reputation:
32
RE: Tacitus
August 19, 2014 at 3:54 am
(August 19, 2014 at 3:43 am)revivin Wrote: (August 19, 2014 at 3:41 am)Esquilax Wrote: Given that multiple corroborations form the basis of every other religion too
No other religion has eyewitness testimony in various groups of resurrection.
From a book called "Problems and Materials on Trial Advocacy":
Eyewitness testimony is, at best, evidence of what the witness believes to have occurred. It may or may not tell what actually happened. The familiar problems of perception, of gauging time, speed, height, weight, of accurate identification of persons accused of crime all contribute to making honest testimony something less than completely credible.
Another problem with your "argument" (very loose use of this word, considering all you have done is repeat the same stuff over and over) is that you have failed to demonstrate that the "eyewitness" accounts are exactly that. If I write a few different documents, from the point of view of various people I make up, claiming they saw something happen, then there is no way that they would be accepted as credible. You are claiming these eyewitness testimonies are genuine, so prove that.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
Posts: 3405
Threads: 33
Joined: July 17, 2013
Reputation:
43
RE: Tacitus
August 19, 2014 at 3:54 am
Eyewitnesses are unreliable: people lie.
There's no reason to believe they didn't.
"Every luxury has a deep price. Every indulgence, a cosmic cost. Each fiber of pleasure you experience causes equivalent pain somewhere else. This is the first law of emodynamics [sic]. Joy can be neither created nor destroyed. The balance of happiness is constant.
Fact: Every time you eat a bite of cake, someone gets horsewhipped.
Facter: Every time two people kiss, an orphanage collapses.
Factest: Every time a baby is born, an innocent animal is severely mocked for its physical appearance. Don't be a pleasure hog. Your every smile is a dagger. Happiness is murder.
Vote "yes" on Proposition 1321. Think of some kids. Some kids."
Posts: 105
Threads: 2
Joined: August 19, 2014
Reputation:
0
RE: Tacitus
August 19, 2014 at 3:56 am
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2014 at 4:00 am by revivin.)
(August 19, 2014 at 3:54 am)Tobie Wrote: [i]Eyewitness testimony is, at best, evidence of what the witness believes to have occurred.
They believed they saw Jesus alive from the dead. None ever said otherwise. These multiple sources are from different people.
What better evidence could there be than what we have in the NT?
Posts: 1298
Threads: 42
Joined: January 2, 2012
Reputation:
32
RE: Tacitus
August 19, 2014 at 4:00 am
(August 19, 2014 at 3:56 am)revivin Wrote: (August 19, 2014 at 3:54 am)Tobie Wrote: [i]Eyewitness testimony is, at best, evidence of what the witness believes to have occurred.
They believed they saw Jesus alive from the dead. None every said otherwise.
What better evidence could there be than what we have in the NT?
So your argument has now become "no one wrote down that they didn't see Jesus get resurrected"? How desperate are you?
You cannot use the NT as evidence for things written in the NT. It is called circular reasoning and is a fallacy.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
Posts: 105
Threads: 2
Joined: August 19, 2014
Reputation:
0
RE: Tacitus
August 19, 2014 at 4:02 am
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2014 at 4:02 am by revivin.)
(August 19, 2014 at 4:00 am)Tobie Wrote: You cannot use the NT as evidence for things written in the NT. It is called circular reasoning and is a fallacy.
I don't think it is circular reasoning. You would have show that.
What the NT is is various individuals recording history. And they all agree the 12 Apostles believed they saw Jesus alive from the dead in various groups.
What better evidence could you ask for?
Posts: 3405
Threads: 33
Joined: July 17, 2013
Reputation:
43
RE: Tacitus
August 19, 2014 at 4:02 am
(August 19, 2014 at 3:56 am)revivin Wrote: (August 19, 2014 at 3:54 am)Tobie Wrote: [i]Eyewitness testimony is, at best, evidence of what the witness believes to have occurred.
They believed they saw Jesus alive from the dead. None ever said otherwise. These multiple sources are from different people.
What better evidence could there be than what we have in the NT?
You're either thick as a brick or a troll. I rest my case.
"Every luxury has a deep price. Every indulgence, a cosmic cost. Each fiber of pleasure you experience causes equivalent pain somewhere else. This is the first law of emodynamics [sic]. Joy can be neither created nor destroyed. The balance of happiness is constant.
Fact: Every time you eat a bite of cake, someone gets horsewhipped.
Facter: Every time two people kiss, an orphanage collapses.
Factest: Every time a baby is born, an innocent animal is severely mocked for its physical appearance. Don't be a pleasure hog. Your every smile is a dagger. Happiness is murder.
Vote "yes" on Proposition 1321. Think of some kids. Some kids."
Posts: 105
Threads: 2
Joined: August 19, 2014
Reputation:
0
RE: Tacitus
August 19, 2014 at 4:04 am
As I read the NT I can't imagine better evidence than this, can you?
|