Experiments that demonstrate creationism.

[Zidneya]

[Lucanus]

They might dress their arguments up with all they want, but the core of their belief remains the most stupid and blatant argument for ignorance and personal incredulity ever conceived.

[Alex K]

And how the last item irks me. Not only because it's blatantly dishonest on their side.

[Esquilax]

And how the last item irks me. Not only because it's blatantly dishonest on their side.

The first one is likewise: it's a supposedly scientific piece of research, yet it was written by a journalist who was stretching the definition of religious belief well beyond its limitations. Apparently, having an internal monologue or enjoying happy endings in narratives are signs of religious faith, so long as it can all be spun into that tired old canard, "atheist secretly believe in god!"

Actually, the whole site is like that; when it's not misinterpreting scientific findings to spin them into religious confirmation, they're representing bad sources- or no sources at all, in the case of amateur writing from non-scientists- as good ones. The entire operation relies on you not fact checking even a little bit.

[robvalue]

FFS, how many times can they rehash the same garbage?

(a) Trashing science does not prove religion
(b) Trashing atheists does not prove religion
© Intelligent design only "proves" some sort of creator, not any specific one (and actually proves nothing at all)
(d) There can be no proof or obvious demonstration of god. If there was, faith would not needed, yet faith is the foundation of religion. So stop trying to prove there is a god, you only make yourself look stupid in a double whammy way.

I not only don't believe in "god", I know for a fact that the gods generally described by christians and muslims cannot even logically exist. I've challenged god to reveal himself to me, I've shouted abuse at him, I've said I will kick his arse, and I've told him exactly what he needs to do. Just to prove a stupid point that I am talking to nothing at all. I am literally more scared about opening my post than in "god".

[Alex K]

And how the last item irks me. Not only because it's blatantly dishonest on their side.

The first one is likewise: it's a supposedly scientific piece of research, yet it was written by a journalist who was stretching the definition of religious belief well beyond its limitations. Apparently, having an internal monologue or enjoying happy endings in narratives are signs of religious faith, so long as it can all be spun into that tired old canard, "atheist secretly believe in god!"

Yeah, that one is just as insulting as it is old.
What it boils down to for me is - when I'm sitting in a room alone, do I feel watched? When I think thoughts, do I feel that they are observed by someone or even act (and think) as if they were? No, I don't, and that's that.

[Esquilax]

Yeah, that one is just as insulting as it is old.
What it boils down to for me is - when I'm sitting in a room alone, do I feel watched? When I think thoughts, do I feel that they are observed by someone or even act (and think) as if they were? No, I don't, and that's that.

Come now Alex, surely you can see that some random creationist on the internet, who has never met you, is much more empowered to know what you believe than you are!

[Alex K]

[Fidel_Castronaut]

"Evolutionary Studies Suggest that Atheists..."

and I immediately stopped giving a fuck.

[Alex K]

"Evolutionary Studies Suggest that Atheists..."

and I immediately stopped giving a fuck.

Haha, yeah, sounds like someone desperately wants to have it both ways