Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: EVILution?
November 20, 2014 at 11:47 am
(November 20, 2014 at 10:21 am)professor Wrote: Every once in a while you hear of a breakaway from brainwashing.
Just as chickens will peck at a spot on another chicken until blood flows and they kill the single bird-
anyone who declares the emperor is naked is attacked.
See, maybe you guys did come from birds.
I didn't.
Look, the moment you can present a cogent argument against evolution that comprehensively accounts for all of the indications for it, maybe you'll get listened to. If all you're going to do is make vague, bizarre assertions about a conspiracy, you're hardly looking very sane, are you? 
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 1121
Threads: 53
Joined: February 5, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: EVILution?
November 20, 2014 at 12:00 pm
(This post was last modified: November 20, 2014 at 12:01 pm by ManMachine.)
(November 20, 2014 at 9:15 am)Logical Adolecent Wrote: So there is a biology teacher at my school who is pretty religious. So naturally, something heated about evolution was going to come up eventually, right? Well, one of my friends who is in that teacher's class said that the teacher called it "EVILution" and told everyone he did not believe it at all. Should choosing biology teachers become a more "selective" choosing? Because if the teachers themselves are illiterate on a huge topic in their subject, they most likely are not fit to be that kind of teacher.
Intelligent DIEsign, CreHATEtion
... this is fun.
MM
"The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions" - Leonardo da Vinci
"I think I use the term “radical” rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one ... etc., etc. It’s easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously." - Douglas Adams (and I echo the sentiment)
Posts: 1257
Threads: 38
Joined: October 15, 2013
Reputation:
16
RE: EVILution?
November 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm
Guys, the truth about the bogus tale of evolution has been expressed over and over.
Youtube has plenty of PHD people refuting the nonsense.
If your tale was a fact- like the facts we all can SEE (like gravity), nobody would disagree.
The disagreement is a pointer to something.
Your geologic column we see in textbooks is bogus.
The interpretation of fossils is based on the bogus column.
The triumph of circular reasoning expressed today.
All the supposed "Links" have been frauds, including the little monkey "Lucy". But this crap is still in textbooks. Why?
Because it is part of a religion.
Religion and Man are inseparable.
All we see are disappearing kinds of critters- the reverse of your tale.
In the case of the teacher being honest about his take on it-
a repeat of "No intelligence allowed".
Posts: 7140
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: EVILution?
November 20, 2014 at 12:17 pm
(November 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm)professor Wrote: If your tale was a fact- like the facts we all can SEE (like gravity), nobody would disagree.
The disagreement is a pointer to something. Doesn't that mean that the Bible is false? After all, even the people who believe in it disagree on many points within. If the Bible taught facts, nobody would disagree, right?
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: EVILution?
November 20, 2014 at 12:19 pm
(This post was last modified: November 20, 2014 at 12:22 pm by Alex K.)
(November 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm)professor Wrote: Guys, the truth about the bogus tale of evolution has been expressed over and over.
Youtube has plenty of PHD people refuting the nonsense.
I have a PhD, too, and I'm telling you that they're wrong and evolution is right.
I hope you accept my absolute authority on things because of my title as you do with those idiots.
Just to illustrate how silly referring to "PhD" people is. The are simply either motivated by their dogma or incompetent,
don't fall for it.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: EVILution?
November 20, 2014 at 12:22 pm
(November 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm)professor Wrote: Guys, the truth about the bogus tale of evolution has been expressed over and over.
Youtube has plenty of PHD people refuting the nonsense.
Protip: if your reference list supporting your scientific position begins with the words "Youtube has," then you do not have a reference list containing any relevant PHDs.
Quote:If your tale was a fact- like the facts we all can SEE (like gravity), nobody would disagree.
The disagreement is a pointer to something.
But we can see evolution. I routinely post a link to an article called "8 examples of evolution in action," in fact I'll do it here again. If your only response is some nattering about kinds, then my response is that it's not my fault that you don't understand both what evolution is, nor what basic scientific taxonomy is.
But you misinterpreting the theory does not mean we can't see it. It means you have a fundamental misunderstanding which is making you speak on something you do not understand.
Quote:Your geologic column we see in textbooks is bogus.
The interpretation of fossils is based on the bogus column.
The triumph of circular reasoning expressed today.
"That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence."
Quote:All the supposed "Links" have been frauds, including the little monkey "Lucy". But this crap is still in textbooks. Why?
Because it is part of a religion.
Religion and Man are inseparable.
But Lucy wasn't a fraud. She was an Australopethicus Afarensis, a Homonid that we have plenty of examples of. What made you think it was a fraud? Do you have any evidence to support any of this? Because most of the so called evolutionary frauds are really just temporarily incorrectly identified fossils that the creationist side actively lies in order to spin out as evidence of something more sinister.
Which is a tertiary concern in the face of the fact that you've provided no references at all.
Quote:All we see are disappearing kinds of critters- the reverse of your tale.
Drop the kinds crap. You can't even tell us what it is or why it should be used in place of the scientific model, you don't get to the pretend that it's at all relevant.
Quote:In the case of the teacher being honest about his take on it-
a repeat of "No intelligence allowed".
Oh, you mean the movie where Ben Stein and his crew lied their fucking asses off? Is that really the kind of claim you want to support?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: EVILution?
November 20, 2014 at 12:38 pm
It is one thing to express your own opinions, but to hold back any child who may want to have a scientific career in the process is just inexcusable. Whether you accept evolution or not, the entire scientific community does, and to push the ideology on young people and limit their futures is just disgusting to me.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 3022
Threads: 34
Joined: May 11, 2013
Reputation:
30
RE: EVILution?
November 20, 2014 at 12:41 pm
(November 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm)professor Wrote: Guys, the truth about the bogus tale of evolution has been expressed over and over.
Where?
(November 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm)professor Wrote: Youtube has plenty of PHD people refuting the nonsense.
Who?
(November 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm)professor Wrote: If your tale was a fact- like the facts we all can SEE (like gravity), nobody would disagree.
The disagreement is a pointer to something.
What?
(November 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm)professor Wrote: Your geologic column we see in textbooks is bogus.
How?
(November 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm)professor Wrote: The interpretation of fossils is based on the bogus column.
How?
(November 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm)professor Wrote: The triumph of circular reasoning expressed today.
How?
(November 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm)professor Wrote: All the supposed "Links" have been frauds, including the little monkey "Lucy".
How?
(November 20, 2014 at 12:10 pm)professor Wrote: All we see are disappearing kinds of critters- the reverse of your tale.
You mean extinction?
Honestly, the amount of questions I had to ask here is ridiculous. Did you ever stop to think that your assertions might need to be backed up by actual evidence?
'The more I learn about people the more I like my dog'- Mark Twain
'You can have all the faith you want in spirits, and the afterlife, and heaven and hell, but when it comes to this world, don't be an idiot. Cause you can tell me you put your faith in God to put you through the day, but when it comes time to cross the road, I know you look both ways.' - Dr House
“Young earth creationism is essentially the position that all of modern science, 90% of living scientists and 98% of living biologists, all major university biology departments, every major science journal, the American Academy of Sciences, and every major science organization in the world, are all wrong regarding the origins and development of life….but one particular tribe of uneducated, bronze aged, goat herders got it exactly right.” - Chuck Easttom
"If my good friend Doctor Gasparri speaks badly of my mother, he can expect to get punched.....You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others. There is a limit." - Pope Francis on freedom of speech
Posts: 1257
Threads: 38
Joined: October 15, 2013
Reputation:
16
RE: EVILution?
November 20, 2014 at 1:01 pm
The actual bones of the monkey Lucy did not have (don't remember which)- hands or feet, so someone added human extremities to the drawings.
Instead of selecting monkey parts to be shown, the deceivers selected human parts and Presto! Another fake emerges.
These deceptions have filled textbooks since Darwin.
Why?
Why are the fakes trumpeted from the rooftops?
Why do the fakes remain in textbooks for years after proven false?
The geologic column is not what is found over the earth.
Some have said it occurs NOWHERE.
It was a creation of evolutionists.
So only evolutionists are to be listened to on Youtube?
Posts: 3837
Threads: 197
Joined: August 28, 2013
Reputation:
38
RE: EVILution?
November 20, 2014 at 1:02 pm
(November 20, 2014 at 9:15 am)Logical Adolecent Wrote: So there is a biology teacher at my school who is pretty religious. So naturally, something heated about evolution was going to come up eventually, right? Well, one of my friends who is in that teacher's class said that the teacher called it "EVILution" and told everyone he did not believe it at all. Should choosing biology teachers become a more "selective" choosing? Because if the teachers themselves are illiterate on a huge topic in their subject, they most likely are not fit to be that kind of teacher.
I'll be back later, because I wonna tell you how to make this guy look like a turd
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
|
