I think I'm in love.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Boru

[Aoi Magi]

...so what's new?

[Invisible Sky Fairy]

Screw being in love; I want to worship at this lady's feet.

[robvalue]

Yes! Yes baby, this is the bomb! Well said young lady. She utterly owned him and he wouldn't even own his last sentence.

Actions speak louder than words. But lies speak even louder. Yet another christian who does not believe his own bullshit, even when it's him saying it.

[Nope]

By calling one of her responses trivial the Christian could pretend he had justification for not answering her point.

Everytime someone shows a clip like this from the UK I want to move there

[robvalue]

A trivial yet entirely factually correct assessment of your very own statement you piece of shit.

[RobbyPants]

A trivial yet entirely factually correct assessment of your very own statement you piece of shit.

Yeah, I always love when a Christian makes absolute statements about some facet of their faith (particularly revolving around heaven, hell, and salvation), but then get all vague and pissy when you bring up that they just implied there's a predictable, gamable system. So, she figured out the way to "win" at his system, and he got all butthurt. He couldn't refute her without backpeddling or adding additional ad hoc qualifiers, so he had to just criticize her comment without addressing it.


This reminds me of someone I read about on this forum a month ago or so. She believed that God would not send anyone to hell if they hadn't heard of him, because they didn't have a chance, and she didn't maintain any mumbo jumbo about the Holy Spirit coming to each person in an "undeniable" way or anything. Of course, once you know God exists, it's now up to free will and your choice, and now each person that knows has a non-zero chance of going to hell.

My first thought was "Stop telling people about God, you asshole! You're condemning people to hell!"

This is why most people keep their statements about heaven and hell sufficiently vague. Platitudes and non-statements are harder to openly refute or even address.

[emilynghiem]

Boru

Maybe this lady should be put on stage with Ann Coulter
who argued that if you want to defend the right to choose abortion
does that mean you agree to be aborted yourself in order to defend that choice.

As for believing in things not seen
what about believing in Justice.
Our Supreme Court building proclaims
Equal Justice Under Law

but if this is faith based and not seen yet,
does that make us all "idiots" for believing in Justice?

[Chas]

Maybe this lady should be put on stage with Ann Coulter
who argued that if you want to defend the right to choose abortion
does that mean you agree to be aborted yourself in order to defend that choice.

That is just stupid. If you believe in capital punishment, you should be executed in order to defend that choice?

As for believing in things not seen
what about believing in Justice.
Our Supreme Court building proclaims
Equal Justice Under Law

but if this is faith based and not seen yet,
does that make us all "idiots" for believing in Justice?

This is a tired, old word game.

Justice is an idea, not a thing. Besides we experience justice, or its lack, in people's behavior.

[Nope]

Maybe this lady should be put on stage with Ann Coulter
who argued that if you want to defend the right to choose abortion
does that mean you agree to be aborted yourself in order to defend that choice.

Sometimes I think that Coulter is actually a troll who is trying to get attention so she can scam us all. For what purposes, I admit, I don't know. It is hard to fathom that the crazy, offensive crap that comes out of her mouth is real.