Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 19, 2024, 10:40 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Do things really need to be limited?
#11
RE: Do things really need to be limited?
(November 24, 2015 at 5:50 pm)Quantum Wrote: I completely forgot to pour my infinite wisdom all over this thread back then. How embarrassing.

Or we could pour some santorum over it, in view of who resurrected it.
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#12
RE: Do things really need to be limited?
Hey, flappy, ask your mum, she's got an infinite black hole!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#13
RE: Do things really need to be limited?
When you compress something down small enough eventually you will get something infinitely small such as the core of black hole.
Since the universe is expanding outwards into nothing eventually the heat of the universe will get spread out evenly and will freeze over.
There are one to two possibilities then since max entropy is reached and all probabilities are reached. Since the universe is not really truly symmetric if you look at it. Overall eventually given time on a universal scale which is short eventually another even will happen sparking another universe or maybe the universe as we know the dark matter/energy finally looses out to gravity causing another big bang this is all just off the of my head. When you have black hole though when it comes to infinity that is gravity at it's extreme causing time dilation so something like infinity could exist in a black hole but given time a black hole will evaporate.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#14
RE: Do things really need to be limited?
I think that infinite is not really a number, but rather a failure of the human language, and let me explain.

Anytime the word "infinite" is used to describe something, it's to explain the unexplainable, it's simply a word that's become a placeholder for an inexplicably large number that is beyond our comprehension or that we have failed to define in a reasonable manner. It holds no value anymore. Saying infinite has become just another way of saying "We don't know", because in actuality, there really is no value that is infinite, it is either a number that has exceeded reasonable inquiry, or is a number we cannot be sure of and may have missed a key aspect when identifying it, and could be a much lesser value even in comparison to the incomprehensibly large value that is for all intensive purpose to explain the highest achievable number in any given scenario we call "infinite".
Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?

Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours. 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)