Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 11:52 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fluoride
#21
RE: Fluoride
I filter my water, and buy non-fluorodated toothpaste. Until I see a reasonable study that ultimately determines whether it is or isn't safe to place in either, then I'd rather not be forced to drink something I did not vote to have placed in my water and toothpaste products. Thank you.
T H E • M U L T I V E R S E • T H E O R Y
Reply
#22
RE: Fluoride
Well here are two (one single study, and one meta-review of multiple studies):

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19772843

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17452559
Reply
#23
RE: Fluoride
I'll use your argument. I'm not clicking them because they're WEBSITES.
T H E • M U L T I V E R S E • T H E O R Y
Reply
#24
RE: Fluoride
Erm...they are websites where you can download studies. You asked for studies...I just gave them to you. When we asked for studies, you sent us conspiracy and layperson websites.

Eilonnwy didn't reject your websites because they were websites, but because the websites didn't link to or include any studies. We are skeptics here, we want solid scientific evidence. You make several claims that *should* be backed up by detailed scientific study if they were true. Your inability to show us any studies only demonstrates the weakness of your position, whilst I can link you to a number of studies that confirm our position.
Reply
#25
RE: Fluoride
I think that you can probably do more harm to your health worrying about if there is fluoride in the water or not than you can get from there actually being fluoride in the water.
[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Reply
#26
RE: Fluoride
http://fluoridealert.org/iq.fluoride.studies.pdf
T H E • M U L T I V E R S E • T H E O R Y
Reply
#27
RE: Fluoride
It's amazing how people don't even bother to read the studies that they claim as evidence backing up their claims.

Firstly, as the brief at the top said, the studies used varying amounts of fluoride from 0.88 – 9.4 ppm. A litre of water is roughly 1,000,000 mg, so the conversion between ppm of fluoride and mg/litre just involves changing the symbol. As I've already said, the recommended amount of fluoride in water is 0.5-1.0 mg/l (or ppm in this case).

So the tests that use higher concentrations of fluoride are not representative samples of drinking water that has been fluoridated, and in fact the studies say this. They are listed as "studies reporting an association of high fluoride exposure and reduced IQ".

If you look at the table of results, the studies all involve comparing small levels of fluoride intake with high levels. The conclusions of the studies are that high levels of fluoride intake are dangerous and can lower IQs. For instance, one study compared 2.01 ppm to 5.55 ppm and found "...the mean IQ level of students exposed to high F drinking water was significantly lower than that of the students to a lower F level drinking water".

Other studies demonstrate no additional information that isn't already used, such as this one: "drinking water fluoride levels greater than 1.0 mg/L may adversely affect the development of children’s intelligence".

Ironically, one study showed that too little fluoride resulted in a lower IQ as well. "A child whose drinking water is above 2.0 mg/L or below 0.2 mg/L manifest intellectual deficits as compared to ‘normal’ control group."
Reply
#28
RE: Fluoride
I will just pull from the debate as defeated until otherwise stated. I will research this further on both sides of the argument.
T H E • M U L T I V E R S E • T H E O R Y
Reply
#29
RE: Fluoride
Well played TMT Wink
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)