Suggestion for all future Atheist Vs Apologist debates

[HannibalBarca]

I'm not sure about the rest of you but I for one believe that it would behoove all concerned that for all future heavyweight debates that their be a real, accredited, physicist (theoretical etc)/Chemist, biologist etc present. These debates, such as they are, often wander into the realm of these topics and more often than not the speakers (almost exclusively in the apologist camp) are, at best, misrepresenting and at worst manipulating the facts.

[Darwinian]

Are you putting yourself forward for such a post?

[Eilonnwy]

Not gonna happen, you see the real ones have better things to do with their time. -_^

[HannibalBarca]

Are you putting yourself forward for such a post?

Unfortunately I don't believe a degree in chemistry and one in pharmacy would be suitable qualifications for what I'm speaking of, though I dare say I'm probably significantly more educated and knowledgeable than the D'Souza's et al of this world. The inspiration for it was Deepak Chopra's schooling by Leonard Mlodinow on quantum physics, they spin,peddle and denigrate science while extolling the virtues of their particular fantasy.