|
BEASTIALITY
|
It's annoying enough when little fucking barky dogs hump your leg.
It's just nasty. And I hate little barky dogs even if they don't hump. The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
 RE: BEASTIALITY
September 2, 2015 at 2:45 pm
(This post was last modified: September 2, 2015 at 2:46 pm by abaris.)
(September 2, 2015 at 2:43 pm)Thena323 Wrote: I'm not quite there yet, since I like to give people the benefit of the doubt. But this thread seriously puts my previous opinions to the test. ![[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-d-3rfdI7nG0%2FTerwtFyFXoI%2FAAAAAAAACak%2F7kFSmHeVrng%2Fs320%2FBumper%2BSticker%2B-%2BAsheville%2B-%2BPraise%2BDog3.JPG)
Lemonvariable72
Copenhagen School  Religious Views: Its all bullshit to keep you handing money to the usher. (September 2, 2015 at 2:43 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(September 2, 2015 at 2:38 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: What is the objective, secular reason for not doing it to babies that are no smarter then animals? Because fucking animals is wrong for the exact same reason as fucking a baby is. Consent. Without consent sex is essentially rape.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time; And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.
Lemonvariable72
Copenhagen School Religious Views: Its all bullshit to keep you handing money to the usher. (September 2, 2015 at 2:43 pm)Thena323 Wrote: Most people would agree that bestiality is a cruel violation and a sick abuse of animals. It's illegal due to the matter of consent. No one's needs a Bible to tell them that. Nope your not. I still want her to address the last part of my first post.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time; And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing. (September 2, 2015 at 2:44 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I addressed the consent part on the OP, and I'd like it if you addressed the point I made in regards to it. I'd like to have a discussion about this because I am genuinely interested in hearing yalls views. Please don't be hostile or dismissive. Sorry, I consider this question an insult. Plain and simple. And I adressed the point already: Fido can't offer consent. That should be clear enough.
 (September 2, 2015 at 2:45 pm)abaris Wrote:(September 2, 2015 at 2:43 pm)Thena323 Wrote: Then what are my "intentions?" Why can't my intentions just be because I want to know someone else's way of thinking and point of view? Seriously, I feel like this is week 1 of me being on these forums all over again. People constantly assuming and accusing me of having "ulterior motives" for simply asking questions and trying to discuss and understand the views of those who think so differently from myself.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh  RE: BEASTIALITY
September 2, 2015 at 2:49 pm
(This post was last modified: September 2, 2015 at 2:50 pm by Napoléon.)
(September 2, 2015 at 1:58 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Let's say someone puts peanut butter or something on their own private parts, for example. Why should that be illegal if the animal is just licking peanut butter and isn't being hurt in any way? I'm assuming, "because god said it's bad" is an acceptable answer for you?
Alright, sorry I asked. Never mind.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Lemonvariable72
Copenhagen School Religious Views: Its all bullshit to keep you handing money to the usher. (September 2, 2015 at 2:49 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(September 2, 2015 at 2:45 pm)abaris Wrote: I'm not quite there yet, since I like to give people the benefit of the doubt. But this thread seriously puts my previous opinions to the test. Well its because this whole scenario makes it look like your trying to set us up to make religious morality look superior.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time; And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing. 
I dunno. I'm kind of with abaris on this one. I think a lot of responses here are being really unfair to CL.
How will we know, when the morning comes, we are still human? - 2D
Don't worry, my friend. If this be the end, then so shall it be. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
