Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 21, 2025, 11:21 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Blocking
#61
RE: Blocking
This thread is gold!
Now I can't pick best theist between CL and MK.
Good thing I already voted. Wink

About blocking, can't help. I don't block people. My bio-ignore works fine and grants me a few laughs.
I know I have been blocked before... By a Muslim, because I showed her Tim Minchin's pope song... Go figure!
Reply
#62
RE: Blocking
I got to remember to lob more balls into Cathy's wheelhouse. She belts them a mile.
Reply
#63
RE: Blocking
(January 8, 2016 at 7:07 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:
(January 8, 2016 at 7:01 pm)Quantum Wrote: No way, you're way too nice for that. Sorry Smile

It's the only possible explanation I can think of. The argument goes like this:

If the members of this site would listen to my arguments which are strong, at least 50% of them would believe. (this is rational, since good and evil should be split 50/50)
None of them believed.
50% of them must have me on block.
That means the rest of you that didn't block me, must be evil.
While the ones who did block me are the good ones who would accept my arguments.
But if they are good, then it's not evil of them to block me.
That means it must be my fault that they blocked me.
Therefore I'm not nice or else the good people who would of believe would not have blocked me.

QED.

There's a problem with your premises.

Either that or you're joking.

QED
Reply
#64
RE: Blocking
(January 9, 2016 at 8:31 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:
(January 9, 2016 at 8:19 pm)Pony Wrote: You really do talk a lot of shit, don't you?

That post was a joke.

Would it bother you greatly if I said I wasn't 100% sure that it was until you said so? Tongue
Reply
#65
RE: Blocking
(January 9, 2016 at 9:26 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(January 9, 2016 at 5:13 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote: Cathy, as the author of this thread's OP, I wonder what your thoughts are on cock blocking.  (I'll take my answer off the air.)

I think it's a great strategy for keeping people from engaging in sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse is always a dirty, disgusting act of human's fallen nature. 

The only time it is ever ok to have sex is during a woman's fertile phase, specifically to have children. It is the means to an end. It must be done missionary style, with lights off, and a sheet between the 2 individuals. The sheet should have a hole on it only big enough for the male genitalia to fit through.

If a queef happens, the act must stop because queefs are demons that come out of a woman's genitals when she is having an impure thought.

2/10 as far as trolls go.

Try harder next time.
Reply
#66
RE: Blocking
(January 9, 2016 at 10:49 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
(January 9, 2016 at 9:26 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I think it's a great strategy for keeping people from engaging in sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse is always a dirty, disgusting act of human's fallen nature. 

The only time it is ever ok to have sex is during a woman's fertile phase, specifically to have children. It is the means to an end. It must be done missionary style, with lights off, and a sheet between the 2 individuals. The sheet should have a hole on it only big enough for the male genitalia to fit through.

If a queef happens, the act must stop because queefs are demons that come out of a woman's genitals when she is having an impure thought.

2/10 as far as trolls go.

Try harder next time.

[Image: 154fs82123.gif]
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
#67
RE: Blocking
I pissed myself laughing, funniest CL post ever.
Reply
#68
RE: Blocking
(January 9, 2016 at 11:06 pm)Evie Wrote: I pissed myself laughing, funniest CL post ever.

Yeah, I giggled.

The thing is, that's so fucking vanilla it's almost kinky, like I was tempted to safeword.
Reply
#69
RE: Blocking
I like "kinky", it's kinky.

(I haz knowingz of Use/Mention distinction. Yesh).
Reply
#70
RE: Blocking
(January 9, 2016 at 11:19 pm)Evie Wrote: I like "kinky", it's kinky.

x1000
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  blocking ex staff members Catholic_Lady 68 8623 November 17, 2016 at 12:10 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)