Posts: 12743
Threads: 92
Joined: January 3, 2016
Reputation:
84
RE: Women's clothes?
January 16, 2016 at 3:31 pm
(January 16, 2016 at 3:13 pm)Heat Wrote: Also would you be fine with men who wear skin tight pants, specially designed to give the exact outline of their penis, yet then go claim it's specifically and solely for comfort?
It's the exact same thing.
Yes, I would be fine with males wearing skin-tight pants if that is what they want to wear.
Posts: 1715
Threads: 9
Joined: September 20, 2015
Reputation:
18
RE: Women's clothes?
January 16, 2016 at 3:39 pm
(January 16, 2016 at 3:13 pm)Heat Wrote: (January 16, 2016 at 3:45 am)MTL Wrote: They really are comfortable:
They stay up, despite having no belt.
They stretch; they don't cut into you the way jeans do. I'm not going to respond to all of what you said, because frankly I don't have the time.
However, if they are soooo comfortable and that's the only reason to wear them, why not just wear pajamas? Why not wear a nightgown? There is a slew of other things that are 10x more comfortable, there's no reason to claim these skin tight pants are only being worn for comfort and you don't care about any other factors besides it.
Also would you be fine with men who wear skin tight pants, specially designed to give the exact outline of their penis, yet then go claim it's specifically and solely for comfort?
It's the exact same thing.
I'm not saying you shouldn't wear yoga pants, that's perfectly fine, just don't claim it for something it's not. If you are in the comfort of your own home that's not what's being discussed. What's being discussed is that somehow anything worn in your a woman's home has become acceptable to wear in public, and anyone questioning that is labeled as being misogynist, discriminatory, or bigoted.
I could wear a speedo in public. Speedo's are pretty comfy right? However I don't because I care about how i'm seen, and to claim you don't wear things like yoga pants in public for at least to some degree the purpose of being seen, and don't care whatsoever about how you're seen and only wear them because they are comfortable, is simply a lie.
Yoga pants are very comfortable, I am wearing them now. They look way better than pajamas.
If The Flintstones have taught us anything, it's that pelicans can be used to mix cement.
-Homer Simpson
Posts: 5101
Threads: 51
Joined: September 27, 2013
Reputation:
71
RE: Women's clothes?
January 16, 2016 at 4:04 pm
What are clothes? I live in a nudist community.
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
150
RE: Women's clothes?
January 16, 2016 at 4:07 pm
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2016 at 4:18 pm by Whateverist.)
(January 12, 2016 at 8:20 pm)TrueChristian Wrote: (January 12, 2016 at 8:17 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Are you wearing them?
Heavens no!
You just have to wonder what women mean by dressing like their dancers in Pharohs court?
Next Poe!
I am not amused. Try biting the head off a rat or something.
Posts: 1587
Threads: 21
Joined: June 13, 2015
Reputation:
26
RE: Women's clothes?
January 16, 2016 at 4:12 pm
(January 16, 2016 at 3:13 pm)Heat Wrote: (January 16, 2016 at 3:45 am)MTL Wrote: They really are comfortable:
They stay up, despite having no belt.
They stretch; they don't cut into you the way jeans do. I'm not going to respond to all of what you said, because frankly I don't have the time.
However, if they are soooo comfortable and that's the only reason to wear them, why not just wear pajamas? Why not wear a nightgown? There is a slew of other things that are 10x more comfortable, there's no reason to claim these skin tight pants are only being worn for comfort and you don't care about any other factors besides it.
Also would you be fine with men who wear skin tight pants, specially designed to give the exact outline of their penis, yet then go claim it's specifically and solely for comfort?
It's the exact same thing.
I'm not saying you shouldn't wear yoga pants, that's perfectly fine, just don't claim it for something it's not. If you are in the comfort of your own home that's not what's being discussed. What's being discussed is that somehow anything worn in your a woman's home has become acceptable to wear in public, and anyone questioning that is labeled as being misogynist, discriminatory, or bigoted.
I could wear a speedo in public. Speedo's are pretty comfy right? However I don't because I care about how i'm seen, and to claim you don't wear things like yoga pants in public for at least to some degree the purpose of being seen, and don't care whatsoever about how you're seen and only wear them because they are comfortable, is simply a lie.
Oh bullshit. You are trolling.
Pyjamas and nightgowns are NOT as comfortable.
Speedos are not a good comparison and you know it.
I wear yoga pants to bed, too. I don't own any pyjamas or nightgowns. Not since i was 10 years old, anyway.
I don't want to show off my ass and I'd be mortified if I had camel-toe.
I live in Ontario, Canada, and it's legal for women to go topless in public here.
Yet I NEVER do.
If I wanted to show my body off, don't you think I'd take advantage of that law?
I already admitted to you that when I was younger, I dressed provocatively.
but now, I simply don't.
I can't even tell you how many times I've WISHED it was possible for me to run errands
and be COMPLETELY INVISIBLE....or not have to leave my car.
Jeans can be too tight and show whale-tail and camel-toe, too, you know.
I don't own any skinny jeans, even though I could wear them.
I don't wear anything low-cut, either.
Sorry, you don't have a case.
Posts: 3676
Threads: 354
Joined: April 12, 2015
Reputation:
42
RE: Women's clothes?
January 16, 2016 at 4:16 pm
(January 12, 2016 at 8:40 pm)Exian Wrote: I agree with the OP. Women should go back to wearing fig leaves.
Well, thesummerqueen gave you kudos and she was voted the sexiest member at AF. So that's probably not what the OP had in mind.
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
150
RE: Women's clothes?
January 16, 2016 at 4:17 pm
(January 16, 2016 at 3:13 pm)Heat Wrote: (January 16, 2016 at 3:45 am)MTL Wrote: They really are comfortable:
They stay up, despite having no belt.
They stretch; they don't cut into you the way jeans do. I'm not going to respond to all of what you said, because frankly I don't have the time.
However, if they are soooo comfortable and that's the only reason to wear them, why not just wear pajamas? Why not wear a nightgown? There is a slew of other things that are 10x more comfortable, there's no reason to claim these skin tight pants are only being worn for comfort and you don't care about any other factors besides it.
Also would you be fine with men who wear skin tight pants, specially designed to give the exact outline of their penis, yet then go claim it's specifically and solely for comfort?
It's the exact same thing.
I'm not saying you shouldn't wear yoga pants, that's perfectly fine, just don't claim it for something it's not. If you are in the comfort of your own home that's not what's being discussed. What's being discussed is that somehow anything worn in your a woman's home has become acceptable to wear in public, and anyone questioning that is labeled as being misogynist, discriminatory, or bigoted.
I could wear a speedo in public. Speedo's are pretty comfy right? However I don't because I care about how i'm seen, and to claim you don't wear things like yoga pants in public for at least to some degree the purpose of being seen, and don't care whatsoever about how you're seen and only wear them because they are comfortable, is simply a lie.
MTL, if you really just wear them to be comfortable then you are a sensible woman who behaves as I believe I would in your place. But if you are actually wearing them to be seen, then I owe you my heart felt appreciation.
Posts: 5101
Threads: 51
Joined: September 27, 2013
Reputation:
71
RE: Women's clothes?
January 16, 2016 at 4:19 pm
My vote on yoga pants, I wear them a lot. You can wear them 'down' for casual wear, wear them for running, and wear heels and they become sexy. Love them.
Posts: 1587
Threads: 21
Joined: June 13, 2015
Reputation:
26
RE: Women's clothes?
January 16, 2016 at 4:22 pm
(January 16, 2016 at 3:39 pm)Mermaid Wrote: (January 16, 2016 at 3:13 pm)Heat Wrote: I'm not going to respond to all of what you said, because frankly I don't have the time.
However, if they are soooo comfortable and that's the only reason to wear them, why not just wear pajamas? Why not wear a nightgown? There is a slew of other things that are 10x more comfortable, there's no reason to claim these skin tight pants are only being worn for comfort and you don't care about any other factors besides it.
Also would you be fine with men who wear skin tight pants, specially designed to give the exact outline of their penis, yet then go claim it's specifically and solely for comfort?
It's the exact same thing.
I'm not saying you shouldn't wear yoga pants, that's perfectly fine, just don't claim it for something it's not. If you are in the comfort of your own home that's not what's being discussed. What's being discussed is that somehow anything worn in your a woman's home has become acceptable to wear in public, and anyone questioning that is labeled as being misogynist, discriminatory, or bigoted.
I could wear a speedo in public. Speedo's are pretty comfy right? However I don't because I care about how i'm seen, and to claim you don't wear things like yoga pants in public for at least to some degree the purpose of being seen, and don't care whatsoever about how you're seen and only wear them because they are comfortable, is simply a lie.
Yoga pants are very comfortable, I am wearing them now. They look way better than pajamas.
Yep, same here. They're all I wear, for comfort, practicality, versatility.
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
150
RE: Women's clothes?
January 16, 2016 at 4:23 pm
Pictures. Pictures goddammit.
|