"You only hate Obama because he's black"

[Drich]

[quote='Drich' pid='1226242' dateline='1458056323']
Reasons not to like Obama:
Polarized the nation turning races against one another, by not speaking out against extremist groups./Fostering hatred.

Does not support law enforcement.

Citation required.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/obam...-movement/
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015...ist-group/

First one quotes obama for supporting Black live matter group. Second is Washington times Identifying BLM as a terrorist, Anti White, Anti police group.

When a leader supports a radical anti 'establishment'/White group like BLM it polarizes people. forces them to choose a side even when they otherwise would not pick sides.

Morgan Freedman says it best. when he said (paraphrasing) 'If We want to stop dividing the country along racial lines stop talking about race. Ie their should be no black History month, Black History is American History, we are Americans not black American and or white american, but Americans!'
http://www.wrko.com/blog/todd/morgan-fre...about-race

Obama isn't even black, yet he seems to know which side the bread his butter is on and he plays to that crowd, America be Damned.

Does not support military, yet uses them extensively

Really.

Really, really!
Unless defunding the military and asking it to do the same job if not more, is support in liberal land
http://useconomy.about.com/od/usfederalb...3-0-ab_gsb

Illegally pushing socialist legislation via 'presidential order' bypassing congress.

He has used far fewer executive orders than other presidents but no one worries about the white ones.

Strawman!
No President has ever used an executive order to push socialistic legislation except Obama. The executive order is not the issue it pushing socialism when the rest of the country via congress says no!
Executive orders were meant to break a dead lock. Obama is not going through the proper channels with his 'legacy legislation.' He is just mandating it.

Past presidents have also repeatedly used this power, too. Ronald Reagan, for instance, issued 381 executive orders. Through almost six years in office, Obama has issued 193

https://newrepublic.com/article/120346/o...ton-reagan

moot

Does not deal in any moderate policies,(as clinton did) will not work with congress to pass any non-left wing agenda legislation.

In his first years Obama worked hard to play nice with the Republicans but they repeatedly blocked him and killed anything he proposed. They are the non negotiators.

What he proposed was not wanted by the people. again he did not look to compromise anything He just wanted to push agenda.

Threatens government shut downs when he does not get his way.

You have this completely the wrong way round it is the republican tea party shit heads who threaten and bluster almost driving the country into the ground.http://www.slate.com/blogs/business_insi...blame.html

Oh, my glob..

Congress shut down the goverment because they could not come to terms (obama's terms) on a budget. The problem is Obama is running the government on credit/money we do not have. congress Said we need to work on a budget, Obama shoots down anything that does not support his socalist give away programs, therefore the government shuts down because obama will not sign off on a budget that does not support his legacy BS. Therefore obama shuts down the goverment because congress will not support his insane spending Or we just spend money, in an out of control way, until someone else comes to office.

History will not be kind to this d-bag if we ever recover from this insanity.

Shutting down policy and support that have lead to 1/2 terrorist attacks on American soil.

Do you remember who was in charge when the terrorist attacks took place? that's right it was Dubya himself.

you mean before we knew them to be a credible threat? You do know Obama's term in office is after the attack on WTC and the Pentagon right? When 'dubya' left we had secureities in place that keep the fighting on their soil. when obama took office he defunded everyone and removed 'dubya's' policies and low and behold we've had at least 8 terror attacks on American soil.

Won't take responsibility for any of this, rather see opportunity to push more leftist agenda and go after assault rifles, stronger gun laws and the like.

Wow just wow.

Indeed, what kind of monster spins a terror attack into a political speech about gun control?

Endorses FBI to hack apple phones.

And if he was against it you'd be on his side? of course you wouldn't. He can do not right because he is the wrong colour.

He can't do right because he's out for number one and more concerned about making a name for himself and shaping this country in to his vision of the future, than he cares for security and privacy in this country. He has violated both to establish his legacy. He is a scummy politician who will say and do anything to get what he wants. Black, white color be damned he is a snake of a person who is running this country into the ground between crippling debt, failed legislation, polarizing the population into seperate races, and  he has  failed to keep Americans safe without trying to hack into our lives.

obama care.

Well its no NHS but its a step in the right direction. So its nice you included a positive.

not being able to pay for it makes it a negitive to americans sport.

Sold US Gold reserves to china.

So?

http://www.usagold.com/ontheroleofgold.html
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/for...encies.asp
https://www.quora.com/How-does-a-country...s-currency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_reserve

This P.O.tuS. sold our future to the Chinese for 6 years of obama care.
(It will be repealed which ever of the republicans gets elected.)

Has this nation in the greatest debt since the great depression, and yet continuing to push his legacy building despite how it affects the country.

No, bush did that.

not according to the washington post. Once obama took office the debt jumped up and has double every year since.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-...-7-charts/

Promised change, got more of the same political nonsense but on a deeper level.

So what has he done too much or too little ? you can't have it both ways.

Nothing changed, just more lies and failed policy.

At least clinton worked with the republicans, Obama seems to hate his opposition.

Obama was a conciliator but the tea baggers and GOP nut balls wouldn't play nice. They would see the world burn before they let the black guy actually make an impact.

real leaders know how to work with and through their opposition Obama seems to only know how to get what he wants.

[Wyrd of Gawd]

I'm sure the "birther controversy" having him being born in Africa has no racial subtext. At all.

The Clintons started that rumor.

[Divinity]

Did someone really just quote the Washington fucking Times?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

I'm sure the "birther controversy" having him being born in Africa has no racial subtext. At all.

The Clintons started that rumor.

You've been corrected on this once. You should probably stop saying it.

Boru

[Jenny A]

Reasons not to like Obama:
Polarized the nation turning races against one another, by not speaking out against extremist groups./Fostering hatred.

Does not support law enforcement.

Does not support military, yet uses them extensively

Illegally pushing socialist legislation via 'presidential order' bypassing congress.

Does not deal in any moderate policies,(as clinton did) will not work with congress to pass any non-left wing agenda legislation.

Threatens government shut downs when he does not get his way.

Shutting down policy and support that have lead to 1/2 terrorist attacks on American soil.

Won't take responsibility for any of this, rather see opportunity to push more leftist agenda and go after assault rifles, stronger gun laws and the like.

Endorses FBI to hack apple phones.

obama care.

Sold US Gold reserves to china.

Has this nation in the greatest debt since the great depression, and yet continuing to push his legacy building despite how it affects the country.

Promised change, got more of the same political nonsense but on a deeper level.

At least clinton worked with the republicans, Obama seems to hate his opposition.

Interesting list. What policy or action of Obama's do you think set race against race, because I haven't noticed much in the way of racial politics in his administration? I talked to black and hispanic who are mad about that, but I don't think that that is what you meant by setting one race against the other.

In what way do you think a president should support law enforcement that Obama is not? What do you think being president has to do with supporting local law inforcement? Or do you think doesn't support the FBI?

What spying policies (including phone hacks do you think are different than W's? Because I don't see anything worse, I just wish I saw better.

I don't see that his proposed legislation is to the left of Clinton either. To the contrary, he looks like W2 to me.

It takes congress and the president to shut down the government. It happened under Clinton too. I was working for the Federal Courts then. I noticed when I worked at an "essential" job with the understanding that my paycheck would resume when Clinton and congress sorted out their differences.

I can't imagine your reasons are racist, Dritch---just knee jerk right.

[abaris]

No President has ever used an executive order to push socialistic legislation except Obama.

You wouldn't know socialist if it hit you in the face with a sledgehammer. No surprise, since you always regurgitate what the pundits of your liking hand out as talking points. If it isn't about the bible, of course, in which case, you shoot of verses as if there was no tommorow.

But your understanding is just the same. Mindless. An amoeba would have more original thoughts. I seem to remember, there's one particular person in the NT constantly running his mouth on helping the poor and the needy and that a camel stands a better chance of getting through the eye of a needle than a rich person into the kingdom of heaven. Just some bleeding heart liberal, only there to tempt the righteous, I'm sure.

Man, the only thing surprising me about you is your capability to look in a mirror without barfing your guts out. But your brand of christianity flies the flag of malice everywhere they go. I don't have words for what you are, only that you represent a first class advertisment for atheism.

[Minimalist]

You wouldn't know socialist if it hit you in the face with a sledgehammer.

But, boy is that ever a good idea!

[Wyrd of Gawd]

The Clintons started that rumor.

You've been corrected on this once.  You should probably stop saying it.

Boru

We know that the Clintons are world class liars.  If they say that water is wet you had better check it for yourself.

Reputable news organizations say that they started the rumor.  
http://www.ibtimes.com/hillary-clinton-c...ve-2118681

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...onnection/

And we know that the Clintons are dyed-in-the-wool racists who feel entitled.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

You've been corrected on this once.  You should probably stop saying it.

Boru

We know that the Clintons are world class liars.  If they say that water is wet you had better check it for yourself.

Reputable news organizations say that they started the rumor.  
http://www.ibtimes.com/hillary-clinton-c...ve-2118681

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...onnection/

And we know that the Clintons are dyed-in-the-wool racists who feel entitled.

You might want to actually read those articles before you claim that they support your loony contention: neither one of them lends any credence at all to the idea 'The Clintons started this rumour'. Just the opposite.

Boru

[Wyrd of Gawd]

We know that the Clintons are world class liars.  If they say that water is wet you had better check it for yourself.

Reputable news organizations say that they started the rumor.  
http://www.ibtimes.com/hillary-clinton-c...ve-2118681

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...onnection/

And we know that the Clintons are dyed-in-the-wool racists who feel entitled.

You might want to actually read those articles before you claim that they support your loony contention:  neither one of them lends any credence at all to the idea 'The Clintons started this rumour'.  Just the opposite.

Boru

They were behind it and got their minions to spread it.  The Repubs ran with it and the Clintons laughed about it.