No duh statements in reporting.....

[vorlon13]

And in a similar vein, how is this an effective advertisement ??




Brian had to STOP racing because the side effect of the drug he is hawking could fucking KILL HIM if he got a boo-boo on his elbow !! Granted, being in a NASCAR crash while full of blood thinner is a bad idea probably something I might be able to work out on my own.

(granted, the ad works on me, Brian is one hot little fucking ginger)

And I still find it amazing with all their money, the drug companies still can't buy off enough congresspersons to get that stoooooopid disclaimer rule canned by the FDA. 

Probably a story there for the cannon reporter in the opening post.  

[Brian37]

Holy crap. While I do value scientific method, there is still a huge difference in unbiased neutral lab science and corporate science. The drug adds on TV are funny, the side effects sometimes seem worse than the drug itself, especially when it says, "may lead to death"......WELL THAT'S ASSURING ISN'T IT?. It doesn't make the drug deadly by itself, but you still go to the doctor. I wouldn't take medical advice outside the doctor's office ultimately.

[vorlon13]

and then the lawyer ads, did accutane KILL YOU ??

You may have a lawsuit !!!!!

[Brian37]

and then the lawyer ads, did accutane KILL YOU ??

You may have a lawsuit !!!!!

The lawsuit adds can be funny too, "Did you or a loved one die?" What's with the "YOU" part? If I died how the fuck could I respond to the add?