Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 9, 2025, 6:21 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
pmdd
#91
RE: pmdd
(June 21, 2016 at 4:45 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:



I replied to this but again it didnt post lol... this time I tried twice.
Reply
#92
RE: pmdd
Didn't get it. Oh mods, something going on?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#93
RE: pmdd
The post was caught by the spam filter but it's showing now.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
#94
RE: pmdd
FSM Grin
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
#95
RE: pmdd
(June 21, 2016 at 4:43 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
(June 20, 2016 at 9:07 pm)Little lunch Wrote: It is fishy that the big pharmaceutical companies would repackage Prozac as Sarafem just as it is nearing it's patent expiry date.

Umm, generic fluoextine (Prozac) has been available since 2001.

Sarafem is a different formulation (fluoextine hydrochloride).  Sarafem is not Prozac.

Might want to check again.

http://www.rxlist.com/prozac-drug.htm

http://www.rxlist.com/sarafem-drug.htm

Just because a pharmacological agent is a marketed as free base, a salt, ..... does not change the mechanism of action. Think bioavailability (primarily dissolution and absorption).
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#96
RE: pmdd
(June 21, 2016 at 8:45 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:
(June 21, 2016 at 4:43 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Umm, generic fluoextine (Prozac) has been available since 2001.

Sarafem is a different formulation (fluoextine hydrochloride).  Sarafem is not Prozac.

Might want to check again.

http://www.rxlist.com/prozac-drug.htm

http://www.rxlist.com/sarafem-drug.htm

Just because a pharmacological agent is a marketed as free base, a salt, ..... does not change the mechanism of action. Think bioavailability (primarily dissolution and absorption).

Ok, let's asaume for the sake of argument that all if that is true. In that case, extendimg the patent may have been improper - but it in no way affected the availability of generic fluoextine. If as you say, the free base and salts are pharmacologically the same, then a hearty "so what?" is in order (excepting potential mishandling by USPTO).
Reply
#97
RE: pmdd
(June 21, 2016 at 5:41 pm)Dust_bunny Wrote: And then we get into a whole new debate on allergy and what "allergy" actually means. I think your definition and the definition of allergy used here is old school. If you think that" allergy" refers to only IgE mediated allergies then we disagree on the terminology but I'm sure we would have to agree to disagree on it.

An excerpt...


I think it boils down to this

Treat the neurotransmitters with antidepressants
or
Pull the plugs on the cause ( the ovaries that produce the offending hormones )

My point is that woman should have that option, long before their lives have been destroyed. But Big pharma makes much more money off option one. 

Maybe they will change their stand when they use their logic to realize they can really profit off osteoporosis.

When all is said and done, the truth can always been found in the most up to date hoarded patents. I will check them out later. I will look for better links on the allergy theory as well... probably wont find much for another 5-10 years.

In regards to your comnent about thyroid issues, yes agreed, but your original definition of the ovarian hypothesis was wrong as it inferred an imbalance so my comment was in regards to your position.

It's a womans problem because it happens to woman and even if it was due to testosterone, it would still be a womans problem...

Moderator Notice
If you post an excerpt, post it as a quote and give clear credit to whomever actually wrote it, otherwise it's plagairism. If you make a huge post, hide tags are your friend.

I'll wait for your allergy source. Not even contemplating your "belief". PMS anaphylaxis, source please. Or is this an anecdote?

Do you know the cost/profit associated with pre/post surgery related medications?  They do profit from osteoporosis prevention medication. Look it up.

You can stay on Lupron for life. Look it up. Oh hell: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3193774/

As for the eggs and 10 years of hormone production, so? Back to make a risk vs benefit analysis on selecting a treatment.

The "ovarian hypothesis" was not my definition. That was the source. So you went out of your way to comment on a model that is not current. Great.

Yes, it's a woman's problem. What's your point? Impotence after prostate surgery is a mans problem. Again, what's the point?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#98
RE: pmdd
(June 21, 2016 at 8:51 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
(June 21, 2016 at 8:45 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Might want to check again.

http://www.rxlist.com/prozac-drug.htm

http://www.rxlist.com/sarafem-drug.htm

Just because a pharmacological agent is a marketed as free base, a salt, ..... does not change the mechanism of action. Think bioavailability (primarily dissolution and absorption).

Ok, let's assume for the sake of argument that all if that is true.  In that case, extending the patent may have been improper - but it in no way affected the availability of generic fluoextine.  If as you say, the free base and salts are pharmacologically the same, then a hearty "so what?" is in order (excepting potential mishandling by USPTO).

Have the same MOA, different bioavailability.

You got it. It's a ploy the companies use to make money from the prescribers that can't be bothered to think. Look at Wellbutrin SR and Zyban. Also happened with the proton pump inhibitors for GERD treatment.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#99
RE: pmdd
Sometimes the difference in branding itself is sensitive enough to make changing brand a little dangerous.

When I was on lithium, I had to keep taking the same brand because my body was used to one specific brand of lithium. Then again, it was lithium. I had to have blood tests every 3 months because of its toxicity.

I do feel like they exaggerate to protect people though. I ODed on 10 times my daily dosage, lithium is highly toxic and there was no treatment for it. It was more than enough to kill me or at least permanently poison my organs but all I did was drink water and I was fine with no organ damage or pain or anything Dunno
Reply
RE: pmdd
Give or take a molecule maybe?... Same shit really and to be honest,  other antidepressants also work on P.M.D.D its just that sarafem was marketed that way. 

Problem is this... when you get into your 40's, cycles become more unpredictable  and because PMDD treatment is only 7-14 days per month based on your cycle, it becomes impossible to know when to start because the cycle is irregular. I doubt they thought about this.

Again...my opinion... treat the hormones not the effects of the hormones. Don't make woman out to be crazy or into abused adult children just because they have a hormone problem.

Anyway, the forum may not be policed which is awesome but the formatting issue complaints and posts not showing up etc etc are a tad annoying, and then you say I don't respond or provide evidence yet I did. But yes, i get it however  learning all the formatting etc feels like way too much effort for something I'm not getting paid for lol. I dont have the same willful desire to make a point as most here... all i did was fucking ask peoples opinions lol... holy shit I'll think twice next time Smile.

This is not university and Im not getting graded... all just a little too serious for me but on that note, their is an autoimmune condition - a type of allergy...

I figure the same way allergy was eventually understood to include systemic reactions and not just skin manifestations I suspect the same will be found about this condition too. I for example have some food allergies ( confimed by testing ) and they can make me vomit, turn green, and near loose consciousness but not a hive ever. As a matter of fact Ive had anaphalaxis three times and two of them were to allergy injections... and no hives, no urticaria were seen. Like i said, i give it 5-10 years. And considering that its being considered an "autoimmune condition" in theory, any number of symtoms could occur.



http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...0610618388

http://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/235289

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007...013-0059-5

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.10...sedMessage=

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.11...x/abstract

http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Abs...gic.5.aspx
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)