Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 26, 2024, 4:54 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Zero-Common Ancestry Atheism
#1
Zero-Common Ancestry Atheism
What If I could present this idea that, atheistically, evolution was not the only alternative to spirituality/religious beliefs? – Regardless of the fact, religion means, “self-immersion in holisticism.” -  
Indeed, I am quite interested in evaluating the alternative routes to an atheistic reality. So perceive this:
 
If opals can be found all around the globe, and topaz too, diamonds, oils, reoccurring minerals, gems of various varieties, as well as common chemical compounds.

Then what, is to suggest that DNA also, cannot have multiple simultaneous or divided origins?

DNA is limited to the molecular composure of our reality, and must be stable and efficient in order to be sustainable or present in current day observation. DNA must also be compatible with a cell, which is also limited to our molecular composure, and must be sustainable or optimal to exist.

Thus, since cells and DNA have a limited amount of forms they can exist in, it is no coincidence that they are similar. There was simply no option for variation. THUS, it IS possible, that there is no common ancestry between monkeys of each variety, felines of different kinds, humans and apes, elephants and rhinos, and the predominant population of species on the planet.

Justly, because these are all assertions which use all the observed sciences applied to the theory of evolution. It is equally as plausible.

Each lineage can have uniquely originated in isolated situations.
Limbs, organs and parts of the body are nothing but reoccurring patterns on a molecular scale. Thus, it is not hard to understand the similarities between living species.
 
AH HA. And what I have done is presented skepticism to Evolution, by evaluating an alternative theory. I did not use skepticism as a debate tactic, but instead created it analytically.

Liberate yourself.
And eat up dat pudding.
Zero-common ancestry Atheism.


This, is superior to eating up the heavily invested in theory of evolution used to manipulate the populations into indulgence, selfishness, isolation and bigotry. Which is the theory the cartels fund heavily to promote prostitution.

 
Reply
#2
RE: Zero-Common Ancestry Atheism
Oh dear.
Your last two sentences don't make much sense. Also, I'm not sure you understand what scientific theory means.
.
Reply
#3
RE: Zero-Common Ancestry Atheism
Only the last two sentences?
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#4
RE: Zero-Common Ancestry Atheism
Are we being trolled? Beginning to seem a little too consistently clunky.
Reply
#5
RE: Zero-Common Ancestry Atheism
I like pudding. Not banana. But chocolate. Butterscotch. Even tapioca.


Oh, and that's a pleasant new font.
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
Reply
#6
RE: Zero-Common Ancestry Atheism
(July 11, 2016 at 11:48 pm)Tres Leches Wrote: Oh dear.
Your last two sentences don't make much sense. Also, I'm not sure you understand what scientific theory means.

Yeah I do. it is supported by and not refuted by facts. Such as EVolution is refuted by the fact that it is not a fact. and evolution remains theory and not fact.
Reply
#7
RE: Zero-Common Ancestry Atheism
(July 11, 2016 at 11:59 pm)Complidudaaldo Wrote:
(July 11, 2016 at 11:48 pm)Tres Leches Wrote: Oh dear.
Your last two sentences don't make much sense. Also, I'm not sure you understand what scientific theory means.

Yeah I do. it is supported by and not refuted by facts. Such as EVolution is refuted by the fact that it is not a fact. and evolution remains theory and not fact.

OK, Cumplidudaado. I'm not sure if you're a troll or not and I'm not going to get into an extended discussion; I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for a moment in case there is something else going on and for the edification of anyone else who is reading or curious.

The generally accepted meaning of scientific theory that is accepted by the scientific community is (pulled from the web) "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation"

If you believe in gravity, you believe in scientific theory.
.
Reply
#8
RE: Zero-Common Ancestry Atheism
if I believe in all the observed effects associated with gravity, all the results found by experimenting with those observations, and all the facts of reality associated with the effects of what "gravity" actually is (whether the theory is applicable or not), that does not mean I believe in the theory of gravity, nor that the theory is accurate.

I can disprove gravity: Binary star systems.
Reply
#9
RE: Zero-Common Ancestry Atheism
(July 12, 2016 at 12:32 am)Complidudaaldo Wrote: if I believe in all the observed effects associated with gravity, all the results found by experimenting with those observations, and all the facts of reality associated with the effects of what "gravity" actually is (whether the theory is applicable or not), that does not mean I believe in the theory of gravity, nor that the theory is accurate.

You have to provide a valid argument rather than just state that you disagree.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#10
RE: Zero-Common Ancestry Atheism
Just....stop it.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A common denominator in great people Lemonvariable72 22 3895 April 23, 2015 at 12:09 pm
Last Post: Lemonvariable72



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)