Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 12, 2025, 4:14 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Universal
#61
Universal
(August 6, 2016 at 7:39 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:
(August 6, 2016 at 7:09 pm)Whateverist Wrote: How can you tell?  I'm agnostic on whether there has been a derailment.

I've come back to absolutely ruin my prior post, bothered completely.

To say this,

You have no forethought, but your mind is able. In times of your favor, you unknowingly use your own and exploit the forethought of others.

You have taken note of what could be a victorious counter from registering the recent history.

You have thought ahead of the face-print, you have considered my cohesive self and found my weakness, which is my word, to come up with the usual fart, clap and giggle.

Your sensory is intellectually moreover your tongue; you will disagree, but you continue to sense this way.

Take now for example, "How can you tell? I'm agnostic on whether there has been a derailment."

You have aligned your words with the thread's atmosphere, and you have considered more than one factor of the thread. You have unknowingly considered the emotions of others, that your post would strike positive emotions in others. You try to force negative emotions with those who are on my side of the argument, theoretically, because of you and others it's just me. You know that I might break and you prey on this moment, you have taken account of time-lapsed registry. There is more, but to cut it short - there's a lot you've took into account.

To conclude then, we can adapt to the cohesive whole of this situation and other situations because they are like these, further, this proves the original post, there is a cohesive whole that you have taken note of unknowingly.


Is English not your first language? Because if it is...yikes. [emoji53]
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
#62
RE: Universal
We rarely ever get atheist nutjobs anymore. It's a refreshing sight.
Reply
#63
RE: Universal
(August 6, 2016 at 7:47 pm)m0nk3y Wrote: I'm a lot of things, and so are you.

I'm an asshole.

Everyone here could have told you that.

Proud of it.

Now, kindly go fuck yourself.
Reply
#64
Universal
(August 6, 2016 at 4:50 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: [Image: 64569-cool-story-bro.gif]


LMAO
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
#65
RE: Universal
(August 6, 2016 at 7:48 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:
(August 6, 2016 at 3:48 pm)m0nk3y Wrote: Most responses in this thread were immaturity; to respond to each, seriously, is stupidity.

None of the members who have responded have anything up their sleeve, and they do not hold back contradictory knowledge.

Since you're going to fling senseless orders around and support immaturity, I'll avoid discomfort and further perversity, and move to a different forum.

Let me guess, you don't care, don't let the door hit me or some other form of aggression?

My point still stands but my interest here is lost,

see you.


That's because no one has any idea what you're talking about.  The OP is just bad prose with poor punctuation.  Can you explain your thoughts coherently?  If not, then don't expect serious responses.  

This is not smart behavior, it's disorderly, and this sort of fluctuates off of you. You expect sources and hard evidence for everything else, but a lot of the time you post with none. You have to extrapolate on your dismissal. You then expect help in understanding, even though you have not helped define your misunderstanding. You cut my writing into lines - you expect me to provide a correlating semantic - from a original post that was a well written and simple to understand. You call it poorly written. 

This is surely enough, you're lost in yourself.
...
The cover art would be the antagonist in cutting-edge black crossing the calm blue face of protagonist in two places, with dual handguns.
...
Reply
#66
RE: Universal
(August 6, 2016 at 7:54 pm)m0nk3y Wrote:
(August 6, 2016 at 7:48 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: That's because no one has any idea what you're talking about.  The OP is just bad prose with poor punctuation.  Can you explain your thoughts coherently?  If not, then don't expect serious responses.  

This is not smart behavior, it's disorderly, and this sort of fluctuates off of you. You expect sources and hard evidence for everything else, but a lot of the time you post with none. You have to extrapolate on your dismissal. You then expect help in understanding, even though you have not helped define your misunderstanding. You cut my writing into lines - you expect me to provide a correlating semantic - from a original post that was a well written and simple to understand. You call it poorly written. 

This is surely enough, you're lost in yourself.

What?
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
#67
RE: Universal
(August 6, 2016 at 7:56 pm)Losty Wrote:
(August 6, 2016 at 7:54 pm)m0nk3y Wrote: This is not smart behavior, it's disorderly, and this sort of fluctuates off of you. You expect sources and hard evidence for everything else, but a lot of the time you post with none. You have to extrapolate on your dismissal. You then expect help in understanding, even though you have not helped define your misunderstanding. You cut my writing into lines - you expect me to provide a correlating semantic - from a original post that was a well written and simple to understand. You call it poorly written. 

This is surely enough, you're lost in yourself.

What?

It's sick, it's sick what you do.

This is the best knowledge you will ever find, I have studied cohesive Man for a long time and know what I'm talking about.
...
The cover art would be the antagonist in cutting-edge black crossing the calm blue face of protagonist in two places, with dual handguns.
...
Reply
#68
RE: Universal
Look, shithead, take your fucking meds or learn English.
Reply
#69
RE: Universal
What the fuck is wrong with this guy?
Reply
#70
RE: Universal
(August 6, 2016 at 7:58 pm)Bella Morte Wrote: What the fuck is wrong with this guy?

It's an actual face that negativity takes it's effect, and I have explained already.

"Put your smile down" - cause we speak the same word.

This is the word, not you.

I'm not annoyed by you, I'm annoyed by the word.
...
The cover art would be the antagonist in cutting-edge black crossing the calm blue face of protagonist in two places, with dual handguns.
...
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 15 Guest(s)