Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
'God' is likely atheistic (I, an atheist, shall likely become a 'God', no trolling)
November 2, 2016 at 12:42 am
(This post was last modified: November 2, 2016 at 3:23 am by Alex K.)
![[Image: yF3R2EK.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FyF3R2EK.png)
['A']
I am but a causal body builder/software engineer.
I am atheistic, and thereafter, I (like Google, Microsoft) shall likely become 'God'.
How can an atheist stipulate that 'God' is likely? [See B-C]
NOTE: I have not any belief whatsoever.
However, one needn't belief to observe probabilities. [Sample Observation: Non-omniscient Gods are LIKELY]
['B']
We shall likely become non-omniscient, non-omnipotent Gods, forging more powerful, albeit non-omniscient brain based artificial intelligence aligned Gods.
['C']
On Moore's law, by 2020, non-human machines will likely be able to approximate human level brain cycles (10^15 flops).
Therein, human intellect is shown to be ' creatable':
Today, brain based models already equal/exceed human intellect, in task/task groups ranging from language translation to disease diagnosis. (And likely all tasks by 2020)
['D']
God Definition:
In summary, probabilistically, the ability to generate artificial intelligence, that surpasses the net intellect of one’s species, and or compute simulation of universes (with intellect resembling prior), is that which classifies said species as God-bound.
Scientific article [from which the above definition is derived] is available upon request (I can't post urls here).
['E']
An early approximation of mine of 'God':
Moderator Notice
Removed github link in violation of 30/30 rule
Posts: 28298
Threads: 114
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: 'God' is likely atheistic (I, an atheist, shall likely become a 'God', no trolling)
November 2, 2016 at 12:47 am
Um.... yeah.
Welcome to the forum! 
Posts: 28384
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: 'God' is likely atheistic (I, an atheist, shall likely become a 'God', no trolling)
November 2, 2016 at 12:48 am
Where is the good language translation? Because I've only found non-human translators that suck balls
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: 'God' is likely atheistic (I, an atheist, shall likely become a 'God', no trolling)
November 2, 2016 at 12:48 am
I thank you
Posts: 28384
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: 'God' is likely atheistic (I, an atheist, shall likely become a 'God', no trolling)
November 2, 2016 at 12:49 am
Also...thank you for editing to make your letters bigger. I almost missed them 
Welcome to AF 
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: 'God' is likely atheistic (I, an atheist, shall likely become a 'God', no trolling)
November 2, 2016 at 12:49 am
(This post was last modified: November 2, 2016 at 12:51 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 2, 2016 at 12:48 am)Losty Wrote: Where is the good language translation? Because I've only found non-human translators that suck balls
See language-translating earbuds, or skype.
(November 2, 2016 at 12:49 am)Losty Wrote: Also...thank you for editing to make your letters bigger. I almost missed them
Welcome to AF
Still in the editing phase.
I have eye problems, so I tend to highlight letters.
Posts: 3405
Threads: 33
Joined: July 17, 2013
Reputation:
43
RE: 'God' is likely atheistic (I, an atheist, shall likely become a 'God', no trolling)
November 2, 2016 at 3:20 am
This shit sounds like it's straight out of r/futurology but yeah, it's all good, welcome
"Every luxury has a deep price. Every indulgence, a cosmic cost. Each fiber of pleasure you experience causes equivalent pain somewhere else. This is the first law of emodynamics [sic]. Joy can be neither created nor destroyed. The balance of happiness is constant.
Fact: Every time you eat a bite of cake, someone gets horsewhipped.
Facter: Every time two people kiss, an orphanage collapses.
Factest: Every time a baby is born, an innocent animal is severely mocked for its physical appearance. Don't be a pleasure hog. Your every smile is a dagger. Happiness is murder.
Vote "yes" on Proposition 1321. Think of some kids. Some kids."
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: 'God' is likely atheistic (I, an atheist, shall likely become a 'God', no trolling)
November 2, 2016 at 3:22 am
Welcome PGJ! Are you feeling allright?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: 'God' is likely atheistic (I, an atheist, shall likely become a 'God', no trolling)
November 2, 2016 at 3:26 am
(This post was last modified: November 2, 2016 at 3:51 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 2, 2016 at 3:20 am)Lucanus Wrote: This shit sounds like it's straight out of r/futurology but yeah, it's all good, welcome
It entails observed statistics (Moore's Law...)
I tend to erase opinion/emotion/bias from my expressions.
(November 2, 2016 at 3:22 am)Alex K Wrote: Welcome PGJ! Are you feeling allright?
[i] I am mostly adequate.
[ii] I haven't had a meaningful face to face conversation in all my 25 years. (Atheism is quite low in Jamaica)
[iii] Due to [ii] I may be dying inside.
Albeit, I am not suffering from hunger/strife, nor do I have any terminal illness. (Perhaps [iii] subsumes as a terminal illness?)
(November 2, 2016 at 3:22 am)Alex K Wrote: Welcome PGJ! Are you feeling allright?
By extension, I had a github reference concerning my latest scientific research for section [E] in original post.
Such was removed by a moderator.
The reference was not a url, but existed in this form: (github~....~God)
Moderator does '(github~...~God)' classify as a url?
Edit: I have reviewed the 30/30 rule. I now recognize my error. (See my signature's second item for Scientific evidence of 'God' by an atheist, amidst my facebook profile page)
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: 'God' is likely atheistic (I, an atheist, shall likely become a 'God', no trolling)
November 2, 2016 at 4:18 am
(This post was last modified: November 2, 2016 at 12:39 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(November 2, 2016 at 3:26 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: (November 2, 2016 at 3:22 am)Alex K Wrote: Welcome PGJ! Are you feeling allright?
[...]
[ii] I haven't had a meaningful face to face conversation in all my 25 years. (Atheism is quite low in Jamaica)
[iii] Due to [ii] I may be dying inside.
My emphasis.
lol
I can't tell if you're trolling, joking or serious. I'm hoping it's the second one.
So.... Jordan. I personally don't think anything non-omnipotent and non-omniscient that didn't create the universe is worthy of being called "God". I consider a "God" to be a supernatural deity and such things do not exist.
Perhaps one day there will be godlike artificial intelligences... but they will not be "Gods" as far as I'm concerned.
It's similar, perhaps, to how I don't consider mere normal human willpower "free will". If it was I think the whole free will debate wouldn't exist in the first place. The compatabilists essentially came along after realizing we don't have free will and labelled the will we do have as "free will". Like "Oh fuck if the future is determined then there is no free will... nevermind let's call the normal human freedom our will has "free will" anyways even when "free will" refered to freedom from determinism."
Like... labelling things that aren't god "god" doesn't make those things god any more than labelling our wills "free will" makes our wills free will
And labelling quantum "empty" space teeming with activity as "nothing" doesn't mean the universe came from nothing...
And calling what we now call atoms "atoms" doesn't make them indivisible which is what "atom" originally meant
Anyways,  to the forums! I shall give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're a genuine member however trollish you seem. Don't break the rules, enjoy AF and stick around [emoji106]
|
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
