Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 19, 2024, 2:31 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why was Michael Jackson stigmatised so harshly?
RE: Why was Michael Jackson stigmatised so harshly?
(November 4, 2016 at 7:38 am)abaris Wrote:
(November 4, 2016 at 7:18 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: My point was the name of the album; Gary Glitter is a convicted paedophile.

I got the irony the first time round.

Clearly.  Clap
You may refer to me as "Oh High One."
Reply
RE: Why was Michael Jackson stigmatised so harshly?
Nah he did, Sofa, Abaris just ain't amused easily. I like him though. I like both of you.
Reply
RE: Why was Michael Jackson stigmatised so harshly?
(November 3, 2016 at 3:58 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Oh. I mean... did you see the full list of evidence thump?

I'm trying to be fair too. With that evidence the likelihood of him being innocent is close to nothing right?

I read some of the evidence -- I worked in Santa Barbara when his trial was being held, coverage locally was pretty intense.

I'm of the opinion he probably did some rotten things to those poor kids, but my opinion doesn't determine the facts.

I'm also old enough to remember the McMartin preschool witch-hunt, and how innocent people had their lives ruined over false allegations of pedophila, so I prefer to tread carefully.

Reply
RE: Why was Michael Jackson stigmatised so harshly?
Well yeah... but I'm pretty sure those people didn't have photographs of naked adults with children's faces morphed on top...
Reply
RE: Why was Michael Jackson stigmatised so harshly?
(November 4, 2016 at 7:50 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Nah he did, Sofa, Abaris just ain't amused easily. I like him though. I like both of you.

Abaris actually cracks me up. He seems so serious and almost robotic in his tone all the time, but then he'll break out the occasional fart comment and it's hilarious.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: Why was Michael Jackson stigmatised so harshly?
(November 5, 2016 at 12:04 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Well yeah... but I'm pretty sure those people didn't have photographs of naked adults with children's faces morphed on top...

It's not illegal to be disturbed.

Reply
RE: Why was Michael Jackson stigmatised so harshly?
That's true but that wasn't the only evidence.
Reply
RE: Why was Michael Jackson stigmatised so harshly?
(November 5, 2016 at 12:17 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(November 5, 2016 at 12:04 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Well yeah...  but I'm pretty sure those people didn't have photographs of naked adults with children's faces morphed on top...

It's not illegal to be disturbed.


But are you licensed for it, a process that begins with asking your doctor if you're healthy enough to get so worked up about shit.
Reply
RE: Why was Michael Jackson stigmatised so harshly?
(November 5, 2016 at 12:19 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: That's true but that wasn't the only evidence.

I was answering your post, not all the evidence.

We each have our own preferences in deciding what we think about this or that. I'm comfortable with my approach.

Reply
RE: Why was Michael Jackson stigmatised so harshly?
(November 5, 2016 at 12:19 am)Whateverist Wrote:
(November 5, 2016 at 12:17 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: It's not illegal to be disturbed.


But are you licensed for it, a process that begins with asking your doctor if you're healthy enough to get so worked up about shit.

I don't need no steenkin' license!

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Michael Scott was right onlinebiker 5 328 June 9, 2022 at 3:22 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Anyone planning on seeing the new Michael Moore movie? Jehanne 16 1161 September 18, 2018 at 10:17 pm
Last Post: Seraphina



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)