RE: The Caucasian People
December 28, 2016 at 6:40 am
(This post was last modified: December 28, 2016 at 6:41 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
Seems fitting here ... a bunch of fat white guys throwing down ...
The Caucasian People
|
RE: The Caucasian People
December 28, 2016 at 6:40 am
(This post was last modified: December 28, 2016 at 6:41 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
Seems fitting here ... a bunch of fat white guys throwing down ...
Who cares, except as a historical curiosity? The term has ceased to have any objective meaning whatsoever, if it ever did, the same as any other racial classifiers.
What most ppl dont understand is that race is much more a matter of bone structure than it is about skin color. Caucasoids can be any variation of very white, to dark brown. Arabs are caucasoids. http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/essay/...ups/41834/
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh (December 28, 2016 at 2:07 pm)RozKek Wrote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race From that link: Quote:Among the proponents of the concept there was never any consensus on the delineation between the Caucasoid race, including the populations of Europe, and the Mongoloid race, including the populations of East Asia. As such, it seems a fairly useless distinction. RE: The Caucasian People
December 28, 2016 at 2:30 pm
(This post was last modified: December 28, 2016 at 2:38 pm by Secular Elf.)
(December 28, 2016 at 1:04 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Who cares, except as a historical curiosity? The term has ceased to have any objective meaning whatsoever, if it ever did, the same as any other racial classifiers. Good point, yet in most forms you have to sign in the United States by the government, all the usual racial classification terms are there: "Caucasian" or White (Non-Hispanic) White Hispanic, or just Hispanic, Black or African-American, etc., etc. (December 28, 2016 at 2:20 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(December 28, 2016 at 2:07 pm)RozKek Wrote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race
"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."--Thomas Jefferson
(December 28, 2016 at 2:30 pm)Secular Elf Wrote:I think the American concept of a "Hispanic race" is ridiculous, and confuses a lot of people from elsewhere. It's literally the only country in the world where two people can look identical, but be "different races", because one speaks Spanish and the other doesn't.(December 28, 2016 at 1:04 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Who cares, except as a historical curiosity? The term has ceased to have any objective meaning whatsoever, if it ever did, the same as any other racial classifiers. Not knocking "Hispanic" or "Latino" as cultural identities, that's legitimate, it's just not a race.
"Adulthood is like looking both ways before you cross the road, and then getting hit by an airplane" - sarcasm_only
"Ironically like the nativist far-Right, which despises multiculturalism, but benefits from its ideas of difference to scapegoat the other and to promote its own white identity politics; these postmodernists, leftists, feminists and liberals also use multiculturalism, to side with the oppressor, by demanding respect and tolerance for oppression characterised as 'difference', no matter how intolerable." - Maryam Namazie (December 26, 2016 at 9:48 pm)Loading Please Wait Wrote: When you think of Caucasian, what do you think of? A crow who cooks creole?
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould (December 28, 2016 at 2:30 pm)Secular Elf Wrote:(December 28, 2016 at 1:04 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Who cares, except as a historical curiosity? The term has ceased to have any objective meaning whatsoever, if it ever did, the same as any other racial classifiers. "Other" is what I've always checked, unless not required to, and then I leave it blank.
Other as in tentacled horror. Got it.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
knives don't stab people people stab people! | Drich | 135 | 11208 |
April 9, 2019 at 8:37 am Last Post: I_am_not_mafia |