Hatred

[Exian]

They're LARPing as racists and anti-semites?

[account_inactive]

They're LARPing as racists and anti-semites?

It's pretty complicated to explain, but yeah some of them. I am not denying that there are genuine racists on there. A lot of them are just trolls, really.

[Exian]

Sounds pretty awesome haha No, I understand that it's public image doesn't accurately reflect all of its elements. That's true for nearly everything.

[Harris]

I read the entire thing and it's unclear to me what point you're trying to make. Are you trying to argue that it's hate that causes the rich to seek more riches and power, instead of greed?

I get the feeling while reading this that you're purposely trying to hide your intent, as I'm unable to tell which angle you're arguing from. Though I could take a guess, I don't think a reader should have to. If I'm right, and we may never know, the next obvious question is: Why are you hiding your intent? My strongest suspicion is that this is some attempt at a Trojan horse. To vaguely point at an almost universally bad thing so that the reader is sure to agree, and then you jump out with your intent. My second suspicion is you're not confident enough to state it plainly. And if I'm wrong, I came by it in an honest attempt to understand a wall of text containing out of context responses.

Thank you for reading the article and for the attempt to give a healthy critique in place of disapproving my personality blindly like others do. According to you the intent of this article is not clear however, paragraph 3 is all about it. Here is the quote:

“This article is exclusively about HATE that is the consequence of psychological hedonism (a view that each of us pursues exclusively our own pleasure).”

[bennyboy]

I read the entire thing and it's unclear to me what point you're trying to make. Are you trying to argue that it's hate that causes the rich to seek more riches and power, instead of greed?

I get the feeling while reading this that you're purposely trying to hide your intent, as I'm unable to tell which angle you're arguing from. Though I could take a guess, I don't think a reader should have to. If I'm right, and we may never know, the next obvious question is: Why are you hiding your intent? My strongest suspicion is that this is some attempt at a Trojan horse. To vaguely point at an almost universally bad thing so that the reader is sure to agree, and then you jump out with your intent. My second suspicion is you're not confident enough to state it plainly. And if I'm wrong, I came by it in an honest attempt to understand a wall of text containing out of context responses.

Thank you for reading the article and for the attempt to give a healthy critique in place of disapproving my personality blindly like others do. According to you the intent of this article is not clear however, paragraph 3 is all about it. Here is the quote:

“This article is exclusively about HATE that is the consequence of psychological hedonism (a view that each of us pursues exclusively our own pleasure).”

Do you not understand that even expressing your own displeasure IS psychological hedonism?  You do it because it makes you feel good, or you wouldn't do it.

[Iroscato]

I take offence at that - I don't disapprove of your personality blindly. I disapprove of your personality because you're pants-on-head fucking doolally.

[Whateverist]

I'd like to propose a contest, perhaps it could be a fundraiser for this forums? Every member who would like to see this dumb fuck banned could donate like five bucks. The winner gets to wield the ban hammer. Please PM me immediately if my suggestion is adopted. Otherwise I see nothing of interest here to respond to.

[Harris]

Thank you for reading the article and for the attempt to give a healthy critique in place of disapproving my personality blindly like others do. According to you the intent of this article is not clear however, paragraph 3 is all about it. Here is the quote:

“This article is exclusively about HATE that is the consequence of psychological hedonism (a view that each of us pursues exclusively our own pleasure).”

Do you not understand that even expressing your own displeasure IS psychological hedonism?  You do it because it makes you feel good, or you wouldn't do it.

Pleasure biases judgment in favour of the nearer and more intense pleasure, even if the cost of pursuing this pleasure is a displeasure later, such as having the pleasure from consuming narcotics.
 
I do agree that even expressing one’s own displeasure is Psychological Hedonism but that pleasure is limited to haters only who are obsessed by their own desires. Psychological Hedonism is all about pursuing one’s own desires and hatred accrued in such a process is not the result of tyrant oppressing the oppressed. I have covered all these aspects concisely in my article.
 
You are blaming me for being racist, anti-Semite, Goy, Gentile, Two-legged Animal merely because I am arguing by giving verifiable facts against real haters (The Jews). In the same article, I have also exposed the reality of BLAME and its relation to HATE.

[Cyberman]

Of course your article is about hate. Hatred is all you know, apparently.

[Exian]

So your article is hatred exists and only Jews do it?