Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 23, 2024, 3:57 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Synchronicity vs Apophenia
#11
RE: Synchronicity vs Apophenia
(April 1, 2017 at 4:33 pm)Flavius Wrote: So which one do you guys think is more likely, our universe runs on a basis of synchronicity or is that just a man-made construct that seeks to find patterns in supposedly randomly given data. I'm looking forward to seeing your guy's answers.

I do not see what synchronicity or apophenia have to do with the "running" of the universe. The universe was before humans and will continue to be once we are gone.
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Reply
#12
RE: Synchronicity vs Apophenia
I thought someone necro'ed an old debate thread of Apo's.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
#13
RE: Synchronicity vs Apophenia
(April 1, 2017 at 6:01 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (to Alex)  Synchronicity is Jung's nutty notion that coincidences are related because they seem to be.  Thus, if I win the lottery on the same day I stubbed my toe, Jung would proclaim that stubbing my toe and winning the lottery are not causally connected, but 'meaningfully connected'.
OK, lemme see if I get this.
If you stubbed your toe in the morning, then won the lottery later in the day, Jung would admit that stubbing one's toe doesn't cause one to win the lottery, right?
But what does "meaningfully connected" mean? If I also ate French toast that morning, would it also be "meaningfully connected"? And if so, where does the meaning stop? Couldn't literally every single thing I did that day be "meaningfully connected" to winning the lottery?
Reply
#14
RE: Synchronicity vs Apophenia
Apothenia is just pattern seeking to the level of a disorder.

On a non-pathological level apophenia is in all of us.

But there is no objective synchronicity in the universe or 'in us'.

TL;DR Apophenia is your answer.

(Which is Jor's previous username in case anyone didn't know).
Reply
#15
RE: Synchronicity vs Apophenia
(April 1, 2017 at 5:17 pm)Alex K Wrote: What is synchronicity?






You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#16
RE: Synchronicity vs Apophenia
(April 1, 2017 at 9:11 pm)chimp3 Wrote:
(April 1, 2017 at 4:33 pm)Flavius Wrote: So which one do you guys think is more likely, our universe runs on a basis of synchronicity or is that just a man-made construct that seeks to find patterns in supposedly randomly given data. I'm looking forward to seeing your guy's answers.

I do not see what synchronicity or apophenia have to do with the "running" of the universe. The universe was before humans and will continue to be once we are gone.

It's sort of like asking if deja vu exists as a physical rule. It's sort of like asking if....
Reply
#17
RE: Synchronicity vs Apophenia
(April 1, 2017 at 9:52 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: I thought someone necro'ed an old debate thread of Apo's.

Effffff. You beat me to it.
"Hipster is what happens when young hot people do what old ladies do." -Exian
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)