Plagiarism in the NT

[Minimalist]

Aquinas's 5W

Ha!  Stupid shit which would only impress someone like you.

[Astonished]

Oh, go jump up your own ass, you judgmental piece of fucking shit. Who the goddamn fuck are you, threatening me with eternal hellfire, you bastard? You think you're better than me, motherfucker? Shut the fuck up about being respectful, cocksucker, you're such a dipshit hypocrite you don't even fucking understand what you just did, punk.

Your false equivalencies here (not that I'm surprised you've utterly failed to come up with anything better) just further hammer home your own ignorance and incapability. You've been fed a script and you can't deviate from it because you have no actual good arguments or reasons. You honestly don't think every argument ever presented hasn't been debunked or dismissed for ages? You're done. Go back to the little kids' table.

Some theistic demonstrations have been abandoned (Anselm's ontological), some are questionable (design, fine-tuning), some remain valid (Aquinas's 5W), and some newer version have been challenged but remain largely untested (Godel's ontological, Plantinga's modal). You can at least admit that some atheistic objections have been shown fallacious (Problem of Evil), inane (one-less-god, who-created-god) or highly problematic (historical skepticism, scientism).

Your absolute certainty, black and white thinking, abusive tone, and insults do not help your cause. I suggest you talk with a close friend or trusted adviser about why you respond so strongly to ideas with which you disagree.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. Do some fucking research, assjacker, five goddamn minutes on youtube will slap the bitch out of your ignorance, or are you also a lazy prick who can't be bothered? I'm done with you. You're not worth the shitstains left on your drawers.

[Neo-Scholastic]

[Pat Mustard]

Nice self portrait Wooters. Taken recently?

[Astonished]

Nice self portrait Wooters. Taken recently?

Nah, he's still in the zygote stage.

[Amarok]

Aquinas's 5W

---

Aquinas's 5W

Indeed Ash I found it

[Astonished]

I mean, literally, you don't even need to go to one of the really popular, very well-spoken atheist youtube channels to hear them refute the Aquinas' asinine arguments. How fucking lazy and addled can one be?

[JackRussell]

Well, your god knows what will convince me, never showed up.

Wrote books in old languages, subject to change and misinterpretation.

Commands immoral actions in his surviving books.

Doesn't keep promises.

His best soldiers waste time talking to us here, giving their best arguments, but still we are not convinced.

Are we blind to your truth, liars or delusional, akin to CS Lewis in a paraphrase.

Why has your god never sorted this out.

DOESN"T EXIST

---

Even if I believed that the people who wrote the scriptures were 100 percent accurate in what they wrote, I would still have no way of knowing if they hd got the correct understanding of any intentionality, causality or reason for it.

We don't know the reasons or systems for magic unless they are clearly explained. If you think Holy books do that, good for you, colour me skeptical.

[Amarok]

when asked about Lewis's trilemma .I always point out there is a third option legend. As for why they would die for a lie. They died? . People would die for lie if they believed it was better then the truth .

[Minimalist]

As for why they would die for a lie.

Yeah...why would they?