Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 6:01 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mathematics and the Universe
#71
RE: Mathematics and the Universe
(January 8, 2009 at 12:36 pm)DD_8630 Wrote: Perhaps the greatest implication of quantum mechanics is that it subverts our intuitive understanding of causality and discreteness.
I can second that. Also this looks very much like what Infidel666 is trying to bring across.
"I'm like a rabbit suddenly trapped, in the blinding headlights of vacuous crap" - Tim Minchin in "Storm"
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0
Reply
#72
RE: Mathematics and the Universe
(January 8, 2009 at 2:08 pm)Purple Rabbit Wrote:
(January 8, 2009 at 12:36 pm)DD_8630 Wrote: Perhaps the greatest implication of quantum mechanics is that it subverts our intuitive understanding of causality and discreteness.
I can second that. Also this looks very much like what Infidel666 is trying to bring across.

Since we seem to be approaching consesus of sorts, do the non-deterministic type mathematics of quantum mechanics suggest a chaotically spontaneous existence of the universe? If not, then why should the deterministic type mathematics of classical physics and general and special relativity suggest divine creation? But, if so, then doesn't that put the lie to "divine creation" being reflected the mathematical description of the universe?
Reply
#73
RE: Mathematics and the Universe
(January 8, 2009 at 4:37 pm)infidel666 Wrote:
(January 8, 2009 at 2:08 pm)Purple Rabbit Wrote:
(January 8, 2009 at 12:36 pm)DD_8630 Wrote: Perhaps the greatest implication of quantum mechanics is that it subverts our intuitive understanding of causality and discreteness.
I can second that. Also this looks very much like what Infidel666 is trying to bring across.
Since we seem to be approaching consesus of sorts, do the non-deterministic type mathematics of quantum mechanics suggest a chaotically spontaneous existence of the universe?
I find it impossible to argue for total randomness, Infidel666. In QM also every observed event has a precursor which causes it. Is that enough to identify with determinism or non-determinism. Beats me. Also The different interpretations of quantum mechanics imo show that it is (still?) impossible to draw conclusions on discreteness, identity and causality. These are the very concepts that the question is about.

(January 8, 2009 at 4:37 pm)infidel666 Wrote: If not, then why should the deterministic type mathematics of classical physics and general and special relativity suggest divine creation? But, if so, then doesn't that put the lie to "divine creation" being reflected the mathematical description of the universe?
All we can say is that we don't know yet what happened before Planck time and that at Planck time, the universe was in a very peculiar state we haven't figured out. All options are still open. The universe might have had a spontaneaous begin at T=0, it might have been a phase of something that existed prior, time might have a non-linear aspect at T=o as Hawkings once suggested, it might be an exchange of energy between the other 7 dimensions that M brane theory describes and our familiar dimensions, maybe our universe is embedded in some superuniverse, well should I go on with speculating, for that's all it is, speculation. Some might add in a god to plug in the hole that's left, or a purple rabbit in the 26th dimension accidentally burping our universe into existence, but tell me, what's wrong with "we don't know"?
"I'm like a rabbit suddenly trapped, in the blinding headlights of vacuous crap" - Tim Minchin in "Storm"
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0
Reply
#74
RE: Mathematics and the Universe
(January 8, 2009 at 6:51 pm)Purple Rabbit Wrote: In QM also every observed event has a precursor which causes it.
That's not entirely true: quantum tunnelling (inc. radioactive decay), vacuum energy, etc, do not have precursor events. They are truly spontaneous.

(January 8, 2009 at 6:51 pm)Purple Rabbit Wrote: Also The different interpretations of quantum mechanics imo show that it is (still?) impossible to draw conclusions on discreteness, identity and causality.
But it's these uncertainties which refute discreteness (et al) in the first place :p
(January 8, 2009 at 4:37 pm)infidel666 Wrote: Since we seem to be approaching consesus of sorts, do the non-deterministic type mathematics of quantum mechanics suggest a chaotically spontaneous existence of the universe?
Short answer: no.
Long answer: let me lecture to you for a few years :p

(January 8, 2009 at 4:37 pm)infidel666 Wrote: If not, then why should the deterministic type mathematics of classical physics and general and special relativity suggest divine creation?
Why indeed. Surely it's better to ask the proponents?

(January 8, 2009 at 4:37 pm)infidel666 Wrote: But, if so, then doesn't that put the lie to "divine creation" being reflected the mathematical description of the universe?
Exactly.

Though both alternatives are false: deterministic mathematics does not represent the mechanics of reality (insofar as we can tell), and mathematics in general does not point to a 'divine creation'.

I think you need to sort out your dichotomy :p
"I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right." - Stargate: SG1

A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone. - Charles Darwin
Reply
#75
RE: Mathematics and the Universe
(January 8, 2009 at 8:44 pm)DD_8630 Wrote:
(January 8, 2009 at 6:51 pm)Purple Rabbit Wrote: In QM also every observed event has a precursor which causes it.
That's not entirely true: quantum tunnelling (inc. radioactive decay), vacuum energy, etc, do not have precursor events. They are truly spontaneous.
True. That's why I introduced the Casimir effect in the first place. There are certain random type events, like the virtual pair creation that causes the Casimir effect. What I meant is that QM didn't do away with causality for a wide range of event types. For nuclear fission, star formation, chemical processes and many other event types, physical causality is an essential part of the current picture on physics.
"I'm like a rabbit suddenly trapped, in the blinding headlights of vacuous crap" - Tim Minchin in "Storm"
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0
Reply
#76
RE: Mathematics and the Universe
(January 9, 2009 at 1:32 pm)Purple Rabbit Wrote: True. That's why I introduced the Casimir effect in the first place. There are certain random type events, like the virtual pair creation that causes the Casimir effect. What I meant is that QM didn't do away with causality for a wide range of event types. For nuclear fission, star formation, chemical processes and many other event types, physical causality is an essential part of the current picture on physics.
Oh, definitely. Causality still exists, just not for everything (as we hitherto supposed Tongue).
"I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right." - Stargate: SG1

A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone. - Charles Darwin
Reply
#77
RE: Mathematics and the Universe
I think there is a sufficient cause versus necessary cause issue for quantum tunneling, etc. Quantum tunneling can't occur without a particle, virtual or otherwise. There has to be some kind of sufficient cause even for that. But I don't think there is a necessary cause for which the quantum tunneling necessarily follows, unless you say passage of sufficient time to ensure that the tunneling is certain to occur. Am I getting it right? Am I close? This determinism vs indeterminism thing is pure philosophy, isn't it? I don't like it when philosophy gets involved with science.
Reply
#78
RE: Mathematics and the Universe
(January 10, 2009 at 12:24 am)infidel666 Wrote: I think there is a sufficient cause versus necessary cause issue for quantum tunneling, etc. Quantum tunneling can't occur without a particle, virtual or otherwise. There has to be some kind of sufficient cause even for that.
The conditions under which quantum tunnelling occurs are not what cause quantum tunnelling, since it doesn't necessarily occur when the conditions are met. Obviously quantum tunnelling can't occur if there are no particles in the system, but it might occur if there are. And that's the point: it might. The event itself is spontaneous and uncaused, insofar as there is no prior event which guarantees its occurrence..

(January 10, 2009 at 12:24 am)infidel666 Wrote: But I don't think there is a necessary cause for which the quantum tunneling necessarily follows, unless you say passage of sufficient time to ensure that the tunneling is certain to occur. Am I getting it right? Am I close?
Indeed you are.

(January 10, 2009 at 12:24 am)infidel666 Wrote: This determinism vs indeterminism thing is pure philosophy, isn't it? I don't like it when philosophy gets involved with science.
Agreed, but I quite like it when science gets involved with philosophy. At least then some headway is made (such as quantum mechanics supporting indeterminism, as opposed to the long-standing philosophical opinion that the universe is deterministic).
"I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right." - Stargate: SG1

A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone. - Charles Darwin
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Studying Mathematics Thread GrandizerII 221 20480 November 19, 2018 at 1:28 am
Last Post: Fireball
  Are you into mathematics? Do you have any cake? ErGingerbreadMandude 71 8730 February 9, 2017 at 2:45 pm
Last Post: Kernel Sohcahtoa
  Is mathematics discovered, developed, or both? Macoleco 26 3605 December 3, 2016 at 11:12 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Can mathematics act causally? Freedom of thought 6 2348 May 30, 2014 at 12:53 pm
Last Post: MindForgedManacle
  Imaginary friends of mathematics. Anymouse 6 4593 March 20, 2012 at 2:04 pm
Last Post: mannaka
  Indeterminism in mathematics josef rosenkranz 9 6603 September 27, 2008 at 11:20 am
Last Post: josef rosenkranz



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)