Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 7:13 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Perspectives on Evolution
#11
RE: Perspectives on Evolution
People expect to X-men out of evolution. It's not that yumpy.
Reply
#12
RE: Perspectives on Evolution
My penis has evolved into something that neither I nor my wife are completely happy with.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#13
RE: Perspectives on Evolution
(September 27, 2017 at 9:46 am)bennyboy Wrote: Evolution is one of the areas in science that bother me.  It's not that I don't believe in it-- in fact, I think evolution is a fundamental property of any system with complexity, bonded interactions, and time.

My problem is that when we talk about the evolution of a species, we are talking about a species as though it's a thing.  This strikes me as somewhat mythological: humans cannot evolve (except in a different sense intellectually perhaps), but what it means to be human is slowly shifting-- there's a kind of Archetypal Man who is changing over time, both genetically and memetically (if I can coin that term).


So what, exactly, is changing over time?  Nothing, in fact, is changing, at all, ever, in evolution, any more than colors change from red to blue in a rainbow.  Nothing is developed, and yet it obviously IS developed.

What you seem to really be describing is the Problem of Universals.
Reply
#14
RE: Perspectives on Evolution
Nah, just a gripe with taxonomy.  

All descendants of ourselves will be human, because the term "human" refers to the genus, not the species. Much already -has- changed since the appearance of the genus, and will continue to do so. The fact that we might persist in calling ourselves "humans" as we further diverge (assuming we do..and that both groups survive to need a name for each other......) simply does not speak to any accrued disparity..or the lack thereof.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#15
RE: Perspectives on Evolution
https://www.wits.ac.za/homonaledi/whats-...rises.html
Reply
#16
RE: Perspectives on Evolution
(September 27, 2017 at 12:57 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Nah, just a gripe with taxonomy.  

All descendants of ourselves will be human, because the term "human" refers to the genus, not the species.  Much already -has- changed since the appearance of the genus, and will continue to do so.  The fact that we might persist in calling ourselves "humans" as we further diverge (assuming we do..and that both groups survive to need a name for each other......) simply does not speak to any accrued disparity..or the lack thereof.

I'm human because I am a Homo. Not because I am a Homo sapiens.





No homo
[Image: giphy.gif]
Reply
#17
RE: Perspectives on Evolution
(September 27, 2017 at 9:46 am)bennyboy Wrote: Evolution is one of the areas in science that bother me.  It's not that I don't believe in it-- in fact, I think evolution is a fundamental property of any system with complexity, bonded interactions, and time.

My problem is that when we talk about the evolution of a species, we are talking about a species as though it's a thing.  This strikes me as somewhat mythological: humans cannot evolve (except in a different sense intellectually perhaps), but what it means to be human is slowly shifting-- there's a kind of Archetypal Man who is changing over time, both genetically and memetically (if I can coin that term).


So what, exactly, is changing over time?  Nothing, in fact, is changing, at all, ever, in evolution, any more than colors change from red to blue in a rainbow.  Nothing is developed, and yet it obviously IS developed.

Afaik evolution is not defined via species or speciation, but by changes of gene frequencies in a population. Speciation (splitting up of populations into groups that don't mate anymore) is a higher level outcome of that..?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#18
RE: Perspectives on Evolution
(September 27, 2017 at 3:04 pm)Alex K Wrote:
(September 27, 2017 at 9:46 am)bennyboy Wrote: Evolution is one of the areas in science that bother me.  It's not that I don't believe in it-- in fact, I think evolution is a fundamental property of any system with complexity, bonded interactions, and time.

My problem is that when we talk about the evolution of a species, we are talking about a species as though it's a thing.  This strikes me as somewhat mythological: humans cannot evolve (except in a different sense intellectually perhaps), but what it means to be human is slowly shifting-- there's a kind of Archetypal Man who is changing over time, both genetically and memetically (if I can coin that term).


So what, exactly, is changing over time?  Nothing, in fact, is changing, at all, ever, in evolution, any more than colors change from red to blue in a rainbow.  Nothing is developed, and yet it obviously IS developed.

Afaik evolution is not defined via species or speciation, but by changes of gene frequencies in a population. Speciation (splitting up of populations into groups that don't mate anymore) is a higher level outcome of that..?

Yearp.  Changes in gene frequency over time is evolution, and evolution + a shit ton of time = speciation.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#19
RE: Perspectives on Evolution
Alex K is completely right, traits are fixed(or not) in populations, not individuals.
Reply
#20
RE: Perspectives on Evolution
(September 27, 2017 at 9:46 am)bennyboy Wrote: Evolution is one of the areas in science that bother me.  It's not that I don't believe in it-- in fact, I think evolution is a fundamental property of any system with complexity, bonded interactions, and time.

My problem is that when we talk about the evolution of a species, we are talking about a species as though it's a thing.  This strikes me as somewhat mythological: humans cannot evolve (except in a different sense intellectually perhaps), but what it means to be human is slowly shifting-- there's a kind of Archetypal Man who is changing over time, both genetically and memetically (if I can coin that term).


So what, exactly, is changing over time?  Nothing, in fact, is changing, at all, ever, in evolution, any more than colors change from red to blue in a rainbow.  Nothing is developed, and yet it obviously IS developed.

Maybe it would help you to think of a persistent pattern that's changing. After all, you can't step into the same river twice because it contains different water molecules the second time. Even the shape of the river is changing slowly over time. Same with a cloud above a hill. The cells in our body get replaced over time as well. So the pattern that we call human is changing over time because of evolution.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)